Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.

Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Abstract Text:

    alai tanAlai Tan,daniel h freemanDaniel H Freeman,james s goodwinJames S Goodwin,jean l freemanJean L Freeman,

    BACKGROUND: The accuracy of mammography reading varies among radiologists. We conducted a population-based assessment on radiologist variation in false- positive rates of screening mammography and its associated radiologist characteristics. METHODS: About 27,394 screening mammograms interpreted by 1067 radiologists were identified from a 5% non-cancer sample of Medicare claims during 1998-1999. The data were linked to the American Medical Association Masterfile to obtain radiologist characteristics. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the radiologist variation in false-positive rates of screening mammography and the associated radiologist characteristics. RESULTS: Radiologists varied substantially in the false-positive rates of screening mammography (ranging from 1.5 to 24.1%, adjusting for patient characteristics). A longer time period since graduation is associated with lower false-positive rates (odds ratio [OR] for every 10 years increase: 0.87, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.81-0.94) and female radiologists had higher false-positive rates than male radiologists (OR = 1.25, 95% CI, 1.05-1.49), adjusting for patient and other radiologist characteristics. The unmeasured factors contributed to about 90% of the between-radiologist variance. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists varied greatly in accuracy of mammography reading. Female and more recently trained radiologists had higher false-positive rates. The variation among radiologists was largely due to unmeasured factors, especially unmeasured radiologist factors. If our results are confirmed in further studies, they suggest that system-level interventions would be required to reduce variation in mammography interpretation.

    Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Publishing Authors By Initials

    a tanA Tan,dh freemanDH Freeman,js goodwinJS Goodwin,jl freemanJL Freeman,

    For similar geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research abstracts see: geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: Breast cancer research and treatment

    VOLUME: 100

    Page Numbers: 309-18

    Journal Abbreviation: Breast Cancer Res. Treat.

    ISSN: 0167-6806

    DAY: 4

    MONTH: 07

    YEAR: 2006

    Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8111104

    Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: United States

    MESH TERMS: standards

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Office of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, Texas 77555-1148, USA. altan@utmb.edu

    Country: Netherlands

    Netherlands Research PublicationNetherlands Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States AHRQ

    GRANT: R24HS011618

    ACRONYM: HS

    MEDLINETA: Breast Cancer Res Treat

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News