Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.

Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Abstract Text:

    sam porterSam Porter,sam porterSam Porter,

    AIM: This paper challenges recent sceptical approaches to the possibility of validating qualitative research and underlines the benefits of adopting a realist approach to validity. BACKGROUND: In recent discussion about the methodological bases for qualitative research it has been argued that, because different methodologies take different approaches to validity, attempts to develop a common set of validation criteria are futile. On the basis of this sceptical view, a number of strategies for judging qualitative research have been proposed. These include suggestions that: it should be judged according to aesthetic or rhetorical criteria, rather than epistemological validity; responsibility for appraisal should move from researchers to readers; each methodology should be assessed individually according to its own merits. DISCUSSION: None of these suggestions provide a viable alternative to validity, defined as the extent to which research reflects accurately that to which it refers. Because the form of research does not determine its content, replacement of epistemology by aesthetics is unsustainable. Because research reports mediate between writer and reader, a one-sided approach to this relationship constitutes a false dichotomy. If we accept the criterion of practitioner confidence as a means of judging methodological approaches, this involves rejection of judgement according to a methodology's own merits. CONCLUSION: If qualitative research is actually about something, and if it is required to provide beneficial information, then a realist approach to validity holds out greatest promise.

    Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Publishing Authors By Initials

    s porterS Porter,s porterS Porter,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of advanced nursing

    VOLUME: 60

    Page Numbers: 79-86

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0309-2402

    DAY: 10

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7609811

    Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.

    AFFILIATION: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. s.porter@qub.ac.uk

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Adv Nurs

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News