Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices.

TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Abstract Text:

    teruhisa ninoiTeruhisa Ninoi,kenji nakamuraKenji Nakamura,toshio kaminouToshio Kaminou,norifumi nishidaNorifumi Nishida,yukimasa sakaiYukimasa Sakai,toshiaki kitayamaToshiaki Kitayama,masao hamuroMasao Hamuro,ryusaku yamadaRyusaku Yamada,tetsuo arakawaTetsuo Arakawa,yuichi inoueYuichi Inoue,

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy and long-term results of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with those of transcatheter sclerotherapy for the treatment of gastric varices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 139 cirrhotic patients with gastric varices underwent endovascular treatment. Of the 139 patients, 104 without hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled; 27 patients were treated with TIPS, and 77 patients with transcatheter sclerotherapy. Bleeding of gastric varices and survival rates were compared between the TIPS and transcatheter sclerotherapy groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors for gastric variceal bleeding and survival. Changes in liver function were evaluated in each group. RESULTS: The cumulative gastric variceal bleeding rate at 1 year was 20% in the TIPS group and 2% in the transcatheter sclerotherapy group (p < 0.01). The prognostic factor associated with gastric variceal bleeding was the treatment method. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were, respectively, 81%, 64%, and 40% in the TIPS group and 96%, 83%, and 76% in the transcatheter sclerotherapy group (p < 0.01). The prognostic factors for survival were the treatment method and the Child-Pugh classification of liver disease. For patients categorized in Child-Pugh class A, the survival rate was higher in the transcatheter sclerotherapy group than in the TIPS group (p < 0.01). For patients in Child-Pugh classes B and C, no significant difference was seen between the two groups. Liver function tended to improve in the transcatheter sclerotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter sclerotherapy may provide better control of gastric variceal bleeding than TIPS. Transcatheter sclerotherapy may contribute to a higher survival rate than TIPS in patients with Child-Pugh class A disease.

    TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Publishing Authors By Initials

    t ninoiT Ninoi,k nakamuraK Nakamura,t kaminouT Kaminou,n nishidaN Nishida,y sakaiY Sakai,t kitayamaT Kitayama,m hamuroM Hamuro,r yamadaR Yamada,t arakawaT Arakawa,y inoueY Inoue,

    For similar diagnosis: prognosis: treatment outcome research abstracts see: diagnosis: prognosis: treatment outcome research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

    VOLUME: 183

    Page Numbers: 369-76

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0361-803X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Aug

    YEAR: 2004

    TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7708173

    TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Treatment Outcome

    MESH TERMS: therapy

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. ninoi@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News