Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Abstract Text:

    k prasadK Prasad,a kumarA Kumar,p k guptaP K Gupta,t singhalT Singhal,k prasadK Prasad,a kumarA Kumar,p k guptaP K Gupta,t singhalT Singhal,

    BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy for suspected acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) needs to be started immediately, even before the results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture and antibiotic sensitivity are available. Immediate commencement of effective treatment using the intravenous route may reduce death and disability. Although bacterial meningitis guidelines advise the use of third generation cephalosporins, these drugs are often not available in hospitals in low income countries. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of third generation cephalosporins and conventional treatment with penicillin or ampicillin-chloramphenicol in patients with community-acquired ABM. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2007), and EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2007). We also searched the reference list of review articles and book chapters, and contacted experts for any unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ceftriaxone or cefotaxime with conventional antibiotics as empirical therapy for acute bacterial meningitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied the study selection criteria, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen trials that involved 1496 patients were included in the analysis. There was no heterogeneity of results among the studies in any outcome except diarrhoea. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the risk of death (risk difference (RD) 0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3% to 2%), risk of deafness (RD -4%; 95% CI -9% to 1%), or risk of treatment failure (RD -1%; 95% CI -4% to 2%). However, there were significantly decreased risks of culture positivity of CSF after 10 to 48 hours (RD -6%; 95% CI -11% to 0%) and statistically significant increases in the risk of diarrhoea between the groups (RD 8%; 95% CI 3% to 13%) with the third generation cephalosporins. The risk of neutropaenia and skin rash were not significantly different between the two groups. However, all the studies were conducted in the 1980s except three, which were reported in 1993, 1996, and 2005. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review shows no clinically important difference between ceftriaxone or cefotaxime and conventional antibiotics. In situations where availability or affordability is an issue, third generation cephalosporins, ampicillin-chloramphenicol combination, or chloramphenicol alone may be used as alternatives. The antimicrobial resistance pattern against various antibiotics needs to be closely monitored in low to middle income countries as well as high income countries.

    Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Publishing Authors By Initials

    k prasadK Prasad,a kumarA Kumar,pk guptaPK Gupta,t singhalT Singhal,k prasadK Prasad,a kumarA Kumar,pk guptaPK Gupta,t singhalT Singhal,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Review

    Journal: Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)

    VOLUME:

    Page Numbers: CD001832

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1469-493X

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: 10

    YEAR: 2007

    Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Information

    Number of References: 55

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 100909747

    Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

    AFFILIATION: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Neurosciences Center, Room No. 704, AIIMS, New Delhi, India, 11002. drkameshwarprasad@yahoo.co.in

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News