Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

The safety and quality of decision support systems.

The safety and quality of decision support systems. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • The safety and quality of decision support systems. Abstract Text:

    e coieraE Coiera,j westbrookJ Westbrook,j wyattJ Wyatt,e coieraE Coiera,j westbrookJ Westbrook,j wyattJ Wyatt,

    Objectives: The use of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can improve the overall safety and quality of health care delivery, but may also introduce machine-related errors. Recent concerns about the potential for CDSS to harm patients have generated much debate, but there is little research available to identify the nature of such errors, or quantify their frequency or clinical impact. Methods: A review of recent literature into electronic prescribing systems, as well as related literature in decision support. Results: There seems to be some evidence for variation in the outcomes of using CDSS, most likely reflecting variations in clinical setting, culture, training and organizational process, independent of technical variables. There is also preliminary evidence that poorly implemented CDSS can lead to increased mortality in some settings. Studies in the US, UK and Australia have found commercial prescribing systems often fail to uniformly detect significant drug interactions, probably because of errors in their knowledge base. Electronic medication management systems may generate new types of error because of user-interface design, but also because of events in the workplace such as distraction affecting the actions of system users. Another potential source of CDSS influenced errors are automation biases, including errors of omission where individuals miss important data because the system does not prompt them to notice them, and errors of commission where individuals do what the decision aid tells to do, even when this contradicts their training and other available data. Errors of dismissal occur when relevant alerts are ignored. On-line decision support systems may also result in errors where clinicians come to an incorrect assessment of the evidence, possibly shaped in part by cognitive decision biases. Conclusions: The effectiveness of decision support systems, like all other health IT, cannot be assessed purely by evaluating the usability and performance of the software, but is the outcome of a complex set of cognitive and socio-technical interactions. A deeper understanding of these issues can result in the design of systems which are not just intrinsically 'safe' but which also result in safe outcomes in the hands of busy or poorly resourced clinicians.

    The safety and quality of decision support systems. Publishing Authors By Initials

    e coieraE Coiera,j westbrookJ Westbrook,j wyattJ Wyatt,e coieraE Coiera,j westbrookJ Westbrook,j wyattJ Wyatt,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    The safety and quality of decision support systems. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Methods of information in medicine

    VOLUME: 45 Suppl 1

    Page Numbers: 20-5

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0026-1270

    DAY: 19

    MONTH: 10

    YEAR: 2006

    The safety and quality of decision support systems. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 210453

    The safety and quality of decision support systems. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: The safety and quality of decision support systems. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for The safety and quality of decision support systems.

    AFFILIATION: Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Australia E-mail: e.coiera@unsw.edu.au.

    Country: Germany

    Germany Research PublicationGermany Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Methods Inf Med

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    The safety and quality of decision support systems Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News