The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal.

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Abstract Text:

Jeanne Daly,Judith Lumley,Jeanne Daly,Judith Lumley,Jeanne Daly,Judith Lumley,

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Publishing Authors By Initials

J Daly,J Lumley,J Daly,J Lumley,J Daly,J Lumley,

For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

PUBMED ID PMID:

MEDLINE DATE:

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Journal Published:

PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

Journal: Australian and New Zealand journal of public healt

VOLUME: 31

Page Numbers: 503-4

Journal Abbreviation:

ISSN: 1326-0200

DAY: 17

MONTH: Dec

YEAR: 2007

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Information

Number of References:

LANGUAGE: eng

NlmUniqueID: 9611095

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Keywords Mesh Terms:

KEYWORDS:

MESH TERMS:

Chemical & Substance for Abstract: The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal. Information

Substance Name:

Registry Number:

Grant and Affiliation Information for The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal.

AFFILIATION: Co-editors, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

Country: Australia

AGENCY:

GRANT:

ACRONYM:

MEDLINETA: Aust N Z J Public Health

REFSOURCE:

DATABASENAME:

ACCESSION NUMBER:

Number Hits: 0

The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal Related Publications

• A proportional study of cancer registrations of dockyard workers.
• An audit of the technical quality of primary orthograde root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students.
• An in vitro investigation of coronal leakage with three gutta-percha backfilling techniques.
• Arterial puncture.
• Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. In this issue.
• Birth then and now.
• Capacity building in public health: the role of this Journal.
• Changes in ANZJPH Instructions for Authors.
• Cleaning efficacy of two apical preparation regimens following shaping with hand files of greater taper.
• Comparison of operative procedure variables on pulpal viability in an ex vivo model.
• Cr21p male sexual dysfunction after laparoscopic pelvic surgery is uncommon when performed by surgeons beyond their "learning curve".
• Different methods of single-session disclosure: What works for whom?
• Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.
• Hospital ethics approval for a population-based case-control study of very preterm birth.
• How is maternal psychosocial health assessed and promoted in the early postnatal period? Findings from a review of hospital postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.
• Influence of fractured instruments on the success rate of endodontic treatment.
• Is the organisation and structure of hospital postnatal care a barrier to quality care? Findings from a state-wide review in Victoria, Australia.
• Panel discussion review: session 1--exposure assessment and related errors in air pollution epidemiologic studies.
• Reduction of maternal depression: much remains to be done.
• Stereocontrolled synthesis of lepadiformine A.
• Surrogate end points and FDA approval: a tale of 2 lipid-altering drugs.
• Taking care of early-career public health researchers and practitioners.
• The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal.
• The role of a public health journal in securing the health of the public.