Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century.

The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Abstract Text:

    buddy d ratnerBuddy D Ratner,

    The biomaterials community has been unable to accurately assign the term "blood compatible" to a biomaterial in spite of 50 years of intensive research on the subject. There is no clear consensus as to which materials are "blood compatible." There are no standardized methods to assess blood compatibility. Since we use millions of devices in contact with blood each year, it is imperative we give serious thought to this intellectual catastrophe. In this perspective, I consider five hypotheses as to why progress has been slow in evolving a clear understanding of blood compatibility: Hypothesis 1-It is impossible to make a blood compatible material. Hypothesis 2-We do not understand the biology behind blood compatibility. Hypothesis 3-We do not understand how to test for or evaluate blood compatibility. Hypothesis 4-Certain materials of natural origin seem to show better blood compatibility but we do not know how to exploit this concept. Hypothesis 5-We now have better blood compatible materials but the regulatory and economic climate prevent adoption in clinical practice.

    The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Publishing Authors By Initials

    bd ratnerBD Ratner,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Biomaterials

    VOLUME: 28

    Page Numbers: 5144-7

    Journal Abbreviation: Biomaterials

    ISSN: 0142-9612

    DAY: 8

    MONTH: 08

    YEAR: 2007

    The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8100316

    The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century.

    AFFILIATION: University of Washington Engineered Biomaterials (UWEB), University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Biomaterials

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    The catastrophe revisited: Blood compatibility in the 21st Century Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News