Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses.

Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Abstract Text:

    kenneth j smithKenneth J Smith,amber e barnatoAmber E Barnato,mark s robertsMark S Roberts,

    BACKGROUND: Novice medical decision modelers are prone to errors. The purpose of this article is to describe the common errors committed by decision modeling students and the changes made to a structured decision modeling project course in response. CURRICULUM: The decision modeling curriculum includes month-long segments in decision analysis, cost-effectiveness analyses, and a project course. In the project course, students solve a decision problem with prespecified assumptions and input variable values, with the expectation that all reach the same answer. At first, students worked in groups of 2 or 3 but more recently work individually; over time, there have been other changes in the course. Originally, the only assignment was an abstract and 10-minute presentation describing their solution, but now periodic homework monitors progress. OUTCOMES: Students' results frequently differed significantly from the expected answers. Errors were common in sensitivity analyses and model construction, among other areas. Defensible differences in structural programming decisions were rare. More recently, result ranges have narrowed as stepwise homework ensures progress and areas prone to error are emphasized. Student communication is timelier, facilitated by homework-related questions. Individual, rather than group, work avoids potential problems with weaker students being carried by the more advanced. Student satisfaction has increased, with more beginning their own projects afterward. CONCLUSION: Solving a common decision problem is an efficient teaching tool. Closer supervision leads to increased satisfaction and decreased frustration, facilitated by a more structured approach and the anticipation of common errors.

    Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Publishing Authors By Initials

    kj smithKJ Smith,ae barnatoAE Barnato,ms robertsMS Roberts,

    For similar geographic locations: americas: north america: united states: appalachian region: pennsylvania research abstracts see: geographic locations: americas: north america: united states: appalachian region: pennsylvania research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: Medical decision making : an international journal

    VOLUME: 26

    Page Numbers: 583-8

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0272-989X

    DAY: 3

    MONTH: 12

    YEAR: 2007

    Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8109073

    Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Pennsylvania

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses.

    AFFILIATION: Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. smithkj2@upmc.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NHLBI

    GRANT: K30-HL0412

    ACRONYM: HL

    MEDLINETA: Med Decis Making

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Teaching medical decision modeling: a qualitative description of student errors and curriculum responses Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News