Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants.

Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Abstract Text:

    karen a robinsonKaren A Robinson,cheryl r dennisonCheryl R Dennison,dawn m waymanDawn M Wayman,peter j pronovostPeter J Pronovost,dale m needhamDale M Needham,

    OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up threatens internal and external validity yet little research has examined ways to limit participant attrition. We conducted a systematic review of studies with a primary focus on strategies to retain participants in health care research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: We completed searches of PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Cochrane Methodology Register, and EMBASE (August 2005). We also examined reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews. A data-driven thematic analysis of the retention strategies identified common themes. RESULTS: We retrieved 3,068 citations, 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. We abstracted 368 strategies and from these identified 12 themes. The studies reported a median of 17 strategies across a median of six themes. The most commonly reported strategies were systematic methods of participant contact and scheduling. Studies with retention rates lower than the mean rate (86%) reported fewer strategies. There was no difference in the number of different themes used. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that investigators should consider using a number of retention strategies across several themes to maximize the retention of participants. Further research, including explicit evaluation of the effectiveness of different strategies, is needed.

    Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ka robinsonKA Robinson,cr dennisonCR Dennison,dm waymanDM Wayman,pj pronovostPJ Pronovost,dm needhamDM Needham,

    For similar natural sciences: science: research: research design research abstracts see: natural sciences: science: research: research design research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Review

    Journal: Journal of clinical epidemiology

    VOLUME: 60

    Page Numbers: 757-65

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0895-4356

    DAY: 10

    MONTH: 05

    YEAR: 2007

    Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Information

    Number of References: 52

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8801383

    Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Research Design

    MESH TERMS: standards

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants.

    AFFILIATION: Division of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. krobin@jhmi.edu

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NHLBI

    GRANT: P050 HL 73994-01

    ACRONYM: HL

    MEDLINETA: J Clin Epidemiol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News