Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach.

Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Abstract Text:

    baoxing liBaoxing Li,kazuo suzukiKazuo Suzuki,nobuo tsuruNobuo Tsuru,tomomi ushiyamaTomomi Ushiyama,seichro ozonoSeichro Ozono,baoxing liBaoxing Li,kazuo suzukiKazuo Suzuki,nobuo tsuruNobuo Tsuru,tomomi ushiyamaTomomi Ushiyama,seichro ozonoSeichro Ozono,

    OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared perioperative parameters, as well as the oncological and functional results, for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) carried out via the posterior and anterior approaches in our hospital. METHODS: We recorded pre-, peri-, and postoperative parameters and complications, and evaluated the oncological and functional results to compare the posterior approach (group 1, n = 25) with the anterior approach (group 2, n = 34). RESULTS: There were no significant differences regarding the preoperative characteristics of the two groups. The incidence of major complications, positive surgical margins, and continence at 3 and 6 months postoperatively showed no significant differences between the two groups. Although mean blood loss (including urine) was not significantly different, the mean prostatectomy time was significantly shorter in group 2 (174.21 +/- 57.97 min) than in group 1 (224.76 +/- 66.72 min) (P = 0.003 by Student's t-test). Also, the postoperative recovery period until discharge was 5.94 days in group 2, and was significantly shorter than in group 1 (7.48 days) (P = 0.02 by Student's t-test). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective comparative study shows that the anterior approach yields similar, if not better results than the posterior approach for LRP.

    Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Publishing Authors By Initials

    b liB Li,k suzukiK Suzuki,n tsuruN Tsuru,t ushiyamaT Ushiyama,s ozonoS Ozono,b liB Li,k suzukiK Suzuki,n tsuruN Tsuru,t ushiyamaT Ushiyama,s ozonoS Ozono,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: International journal of urology : official journa

    VOLUME: 14

    Page Numbers: 1005-8

    Journal Abbreviation: Int. J. Urol.

    ISSN: 0919-8172

    DAY: 24

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 2007

    Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9440237

    Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

    Country: Australia

    Australia Research PublicationAustralia Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Int J Urol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Retrospective comparative study of 59 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal anterior versus transperitoneal posterior approach Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News