Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Abstract Text:

    seth a capelloSeth A Capello,judd boczkoJudd Boczko,hitendra r h patelHitendra R H Patel,jean v josephJean V Joseph,seth a capelloSeth A Capello,judd boczkoJudd Boczko,hitendra r h patelHitendra R H Patel,jean v josephJean V Joseph,

    PURPOSE: Although extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is gaining popularity, the majority of these procedures are performed transperitoneally. The purpose of this study was to compare the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches for RARP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 62 consecutive patients undergoing RARP into two equal groups according to the route of access. The groups were evaluated for age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration, total operating time, estimated blood loss, specimen weight, pathologic Gleason score and stage, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and surgical-margin status. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal groups with respect total operative time (181 v 191 minutes), blood loss (199 v 163 mL), pathologic Gleason score (6.6 v 6.7), specimen weight (53 v 48 g), or positive-margin status (0 v 1 patient). There were no significant differences in age (56 v 59 years) or PSA (7.8 v 6.1 ng/dL). However, the BMI was significantly higher in the extraperitoneal group (29.8 v 26.5 kg/m(2); P < 0.01). The only complication in the study was a urine leak, which occurred in the transperitoneal group and was managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in operative parameters in the two groups. Choice of access should be based on patient characteristics as well as surgeon preference. Patients who have had abdominal operations are best suited for the extraperitoneal route. Surgeons should be familiar with both approaches in order to provide patients with the best care.

    Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Publishing Authors By Initials

    sa capelloSA Capello,j boczkoJ Boczko,hr patelHR Patel,jv josephJV Joseph,sa capelloSA Capello,j boczkoJ Boczko,hr patelHR Patel,jv josephJV Joseph,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of endourology / Endourological Society

    VOLUME: 21

    Page Numbers: 1199-202

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Endourol.

    ISSN: 0892-7790

    DAY: 22

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8807503

    Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Urology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Endourol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News