Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults.

Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Abstract Text:

    j robertsonJ Robertson,w zhangW Zhang,j j liuJ J Liu,k r muirK R Muir,r a maciewiczR A Maciewicz,m dohertyM Doherty,j robertsonJ Robertson,w zhangW Zhang,j j liuJ J Liu,k r muirK R Muir,r a maciewiczR A Maciewicz,m dohertyM Doherty,

    The smaller index to ring finger (2D:4D) ratio has been considered as a 'male finger pattern' and is associated with sporting ability and a number of conditions. However, the ratio may vary according to what is measured, the hand selected and the method used. This study aimed to determine: (1) which bones (phalanges, metacarpals or both) account for variation in the 2D:4D ratio; (2) whether the ratio shows right-left symmetry or relates to hand dominance; and (3) the correlation between visual classification and measured determinations of the ratio based on radiographs. Hand radiographs obtained as part of a large osteoarthritis genetic study were examined. Each hand was classified visually into three types according to the relative length of the index and ring finger: Type 1 (index longer than ring), Type 2 (index = ring) and Type 3 (index shorter than ring). For both index and ring fingers we measured (1) from base of proximal to tip of distal phalanx and (2) metacarpal length. Reproducibility of the classification and measurements were examined using kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient; symmetry between left and right hands was examined using Bland and Altman's agreement analysis; and correlation between visual classification and 2D:4D ratio data was analysed using the anova linearity test. Data were obtained from 3172 radiographs (1636 men, 1536 women; mean age 67 +/- 7.9 years, range 45-86 years). Prevalence of Type 3 hand was 61% in men and 37% in women (P < 0.001). Men had smaller 2D:4D ratios than women for phalanges (0.908 versus 0.922, P < 0.01), metacarpals (1.152 versus 1.157, P < 0.01) and the sum of phalanges plus metacarpals (1.005 versus 1.015, P < 0.01). The mean difference between right and left was -0.001 (95% limit of agreement -0.035, 0.032) for the phalangeal ratio and 0.003 (95% limit of agreement -0.051 to 0.057) for the metacarpal ratio. The 2D:4D ratio did not associate with handedness or age. There was a linear trend between the visual classification of hand type and the 2D:4D ratio data (P < 0.001). More technical difficulties (due to positioning, finger trauma, osteoarthritis) were encountered with the phalangeal ratio and visual categorization than with the metacarpal ratio: the latter could be measured in 98.7% of the study population. We concluded that measured 2D:4D ratios and visual categorization can be derived from hand radiographs. The phalanges and metacarpals both contribute to the variation in 2D:4D ratio with smaller ratios observed in men than in women. The ratio is symmetrical with only very small differences between right and left hands. Visual classification may be a useful simple tool for future epidemiological studies but is more prone to bias from positioning than direct measurement. If radiographs are used for this purpose, we recommend the metacarpal ratio with measurement of a single index hand or an average of both as it is least affected by bias from malpositioning, trauma or common joint disease.

    Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Publishing Authors By Initials

    j robertsonJ Robertson,w zhangW Zhang,jj liuJJ Liu,kr muirKR Muir,ra maciewiczRA Maciewicz,m dohertyM Doherty,j robertsonJ Robertson,w zhangW Zhang,jj liuJJ Liu,kr muirKR Muir,ra maciewiczRA Maciewicz,m dohertyM Doherty,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of anatomy

    VOLUME: 212

    Page Numbers: 42-8

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Anat.

    ISSN: 0021-8782

    DAY: 13

    MONTH: 11

    YEAR: 2007

    Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 137162

    Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio (2D:4D) in adults.

    AFFILIATION: Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, UK.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Anat

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Radiographic assessment of the index to ring finger ratio 2D:4D in adults Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News