Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial.

Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Abstract Text:

    Background Most health promotion trials in cancer screening offer limited evidence of external validity. We assessed internal and external validity in a nationwide, population-based trial of an intervention to promote regular mammography screening. Methods Beginning in September 2000, study candidates age 52 years and older (n = 23000) were randomly selected from the National Registry of Women Veterans and sent an eligibility survey. Consistent with intention-to-treat principles for effectiveness trials, we randomly assigned eligible respondents and nonrespondents to one of five groups. We mailed baseline surveys to groups 1-3 followed by intervention materials of varying personalization to groups 1 and 2. We delayed mailing baseline surveys to two additional control groups to coincide with the mailing of postintervention follow-up surveys to groups 1-3 at year 1 (group 4) and year 2 (group 5). Mammography rates were determined from self-report and Veterans Health Administration records. To assess internal validity, we compared groups on participation and factors associated with mammography screening at each stage. To assess external validity, we compared groups 3, 4, and 5 on mammography rates at the most recent follow-up to detect any cueing effects of prior surveys and at the respective baselines to uncover any secular trends. We also compared nonparticipants with participants on factors associated with mammography screening at the trial's end. Results We established study eligibility for 21340 (92.8%) of the study candidates. Groups 1-3 were similar throughout the trial in participation and correlates of mammography screening. No statistically significant survey cueing effects or differences between nonparticipants and participants across groups were observed. Mammography screening rates over the 30 months preceding the respective baselines were lower in group 5 (82.3% by self-report) than in groups 1-4 (85.1%, P = .024, group 5 vs groups 1-4 combined), suggesting a decline over time similar to that reported for US women in general. Conclusion This systematic assessment provides evidence of the trial's internal and external validity and illustrates an approach to evaluating validity that is readily adaptable to future trials of behavioral interventions.

    Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    VOLUME: 100

    Page Numbers: 333-46

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    ISSN: 1460-2105

    DAY: 26

    MONTH: 02

    YEAR: 2008

    Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7503089

    Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial.

    AFFILIATION: Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6410 Fannin St, LL.125, Houston, TX 77030. deborah.j.deljunco@uth.tmc.edu.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Natl Cancer Inst

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Promoting regular mammography screening I A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News