Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.

Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Abstract Text:

    hussein z nooraniHussein Z Noorani,donald r husereauDonald R Husereau,rhonda boudreauRhonda Boudreau,becky skidmoreBecky Skidmore,

    OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify and compare various practical and current approaches of health technology assessment (HTA) priority setting. METHODS: A literature search was performed across PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and Cochrane. Given an earlier review conducted by European agencies (EUR-ASSESS project), the search was limited to literature indexed from 1996 onward. We also searched Web sites of HTA agencies as well as HTAi and ISTAHC conference abstracts. Agency representatives were contacted for information about their priority-setting processes. Reports on practical approaches selected through these sources were identified independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: A total of twelve current priority-setting frameworks from eleven agencies were identified. Ten countries were represented: Canada, Denmark, England, Hungary, Israel, Scotland, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, and United States. Fifty-nine unique HTA priority-setting criteria were divided into eleven categories (alternatives; budget impact; clinical impact; controversial nature of proposed technology; disease burden; economic impact; ethical, legal, or psychosocial implications; evidence; interest; timeliness of review; variation in rates of use). Differences across HTA agencies were found regarding procedures for categorizing, scoring, and weighing of policy criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in the methods for priority setting of health technology assessment across HTA agencies. Quantitative rating methods and consideration of cost benefit for priority setting were seldom used. These study results will assist HTA agencies that are re-visiting or developing their prioritization methods.

    Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Publishing Authors By Initials

    hz nooraniHZ Noorani,dr husereauDR Husereau,r boudreauR Boudreau,b skidmoreB Skidmore,

    For similar health care economics and organizations: technology assessment, biomedical research abstracts see: health care economics and organizations: technology assessment, biomedical research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Review

    Journal: International journal of technology assessment in

    VOLUME: 23

    Page Numbers: 310-5

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0266-4623

    DAY: 21

    MONTH: 11

    YEAR: 2007

    Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Information

    Number of References: 32

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8508113

    Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Technology Assessment, Biomedical

    MESH TERMS: organization & administration

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.

    AFFILIATION: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. husseinn@cadth.ca [corrected]

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Int J Technol Assess Health Ca

    REFSOURCE: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 A

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News