Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.

Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Abstract Text:

    anne-catherine pouleurAnne-Catherine Pouleur, le polain de waroux le Polain de Waroux, pasquet Pasquet,david vancraeynestDavid Vancraeynest,jean-louis j vanoverscheldeJean-Louis J Vanoverschelde,bernhard l gerberBernhard L Gerber,anne-catherine pouleurAnne-Catherine Pouleur, le polain de waroux le Polain de Waroux, pasquet Pasquet,david vancraeynestDavid Vancraeynest,jean-louis j vanoverscheldeJean-Louis J Vanoverschelde,bernhard l gerberBernhard L Gerber,

    PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of planimetric and continuity equation measurements of aortic valve area (AVA) by cardiac MR (cMR) to each other and against transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients (21 men, mean age = 67 +/- 13 years) with aortic stenosis (AS) and 16 controls (12 men, mean age = 57 +/- 14 years) underwent measurement of AVA by planimetric and continuity equation cMR. Measurements were compared to TEE planimetry and continuity equation TTE. RESULTS: AVA by continuity equation cMR correlated highly to continuity equation TTE (r = 0.98) and was not significantly different (1.8 +/- 1.3 cm(2) vs. 1.8 +/- 1.4 cm(2), P = 0.62). Similarly, AVA by cMR planimetry was not statistically different from TEE planimetry (2.1 +/- 1.7 cm(2) vs. 2.1 +/- 1.6 cm(2), P = 0.34) and correlated highly (r = 0.98). Yet planimetric measurements of AVA by cMR and TEE were significantly higher than AVA by continuity equation cMR (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) and TTE (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both planimetry and continuity equation-based measurements of AVA by cMR are equally accurate. However, similar to TEE, cMR AVA is larger by planimetry than by continuity equation. This is consistent with the contention that the anatomical maximum opening of a stenotic aortic valve is larger than the size of the functional vena contracta. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

    Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ac pouleurAC Pouleur,jb le polain de warouxJB le Polain de Waroux,a pasquetA Pasquet,d vancraeynestD Vancraeynest,jl vanoverscheldeJL Vanoverschelde,bl gerberBL Gerber,ac pouleurAC Pouleur,jb le polain de warouxJB le Polain de Waroux,a pasquetA Pasquet,d vancraeynestD Vancraeynest,jl vanoverscheldeJL Vanoverschelde,bl gerberBL Gerber,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI

    VOLUME: 26

    Page Numbers: 1436-43

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1053-1807

    DAY: 10

    MONTH: Dec

    YEAR: 2007

    Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9105850

    Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.

    AFFILIATION: Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Magn Reson Imaging

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News