Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Abstract Text:

    c r irishC R Irish,t f meaneyT F Meaney,

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography has become a well accepted and safe method of examining the biliary system. Recent reports emphasize the use of thin-guage Chiba needle, citing increased safety and accuracy, while others express preference for the larger sheathed needle for therapeutic drainage. A total of 80 procedures in 72 patients was reviewed to determine success rates relative to needle size in dilated or nondilated ducts. With a dilated biliary system, procedures using the large needle were successful in 92% (24/26) of the procedures versus 80.8% (21/26) using the Chiba needle; the differences were not statistically significant. Chiba needle studies were successful in 41.7% (10/24) of patients with nondilated ducts. The number of studies of nondilated ducts with the large needle was small and not statistically significant. Complication rates were comparable. Recommendations are made for needle choice in various patients.

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Publishing Authors By Initials

    cr irishCR Irish,tf meaneyTF Meaney,

    For similar investigative techniques: epidemiologic methods: statistics as topic: probability: risk research abstracts see: investigative techniques: epidemiologic methods: statistics as topic: probability: risk research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

    VOLUME: 134

    Page Numbers: 137-40

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0361-803X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Jan

    YEAR: 1980

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7708173

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Risk

    MESH TERMS: instrumentation

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles.

    AFFILIATION:

    Country: UNITED STATES

    UNITED STATES Research PublicationUNITED STATES Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: comparison of success and risk using 19- versus 22-gauge needles Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News