Standardized outcome measurement in wound healing has been an elusive goal. Whilst research into wound healing science and technology continues to progress rapidly, the lack of a uniform outcome assessment is making comparative analysis of results difficult. This paper seeks to outline the reported clinical, physiological, and histological outcomes that have been utilized in the literature. A minimal data set base for wound outcome evaluation is also established to be validated by future multivariate analysis of patient data.
Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward. Publishing Authors By Initials
Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward. Journal Published:
PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article
Journal: The international journal of lower extremity wound
VOLUME: 6
Page Numbers: 284-90
Journal Abbreviation:
ISSN: 1534-7346
DAY: 30
MONTH: Dec
YEAR: 2007
Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward. Information
Number of References:
LANGUAGE: eng
NlmUniqueID: 101128359
Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward. Keywords Mesh Terms:
KEYWORDS:
MESH TERMS:
Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward. Information
Substance Name:
Registry Number:
Grant and Affiliation Information for Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward.
AFFILIATION: Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liverpool Hospital and South Western Clinical School University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Country: United States
AGENCY:
GRANT:
ACRONYM:
MEDLINETA: Int J Low Extrem Wounds
REFSOURCE:
DATABASENAME:
ACCESSION NUMBER:
Number Hits: 0
Outcome measurements in wound healing are not inclusive: a way forward Related Publications