Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study.

Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Abstract Text:

    anna r gagliardiAnna R Gagliardi,frances c wrightFrances C Wright,mahmoud a khalifaMahmoud A Khalifa,andrew j smithAndrew J Smith,

    BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) retrieval by surgeons, and assessment by pathologists of at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) predicts the need for adjuvant treatment and improved survival. Different interventions (educational presentation, engaging clinical opinion leaders, performance data sent to hospital executives) to improve compliance with this practice had variable results. This exploratory study examined factors hypothesized to have influenced the outcome of those interventions. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 surgeons and pathologists at eleven hospitals. Clinicians were identified by intervention organizers, public licensing body database, and referral from interviewees. An interview guide incorporating open-ended questions was pilot-tested on one surgeon and pathologist. A single investigator conducted all interviews by phone. Transcripts were analyzed independently by two investigators using a grounded approach,ho then compared findings to resolve differences. RESULTS: Improvements in LN staging practice may have occurred largely due to educational presentations that created awareness, and self-initiated changes undertaken by pathologists. Executives that received performance data may not have shared this with staff, and opinion leaders engaged to promote compliance may not have fulfilled their roles. Barriers to change that are potentially amenable to quality improvement included perceptions about the practice (perceived lack of evidence for the need to examine at least 12 LNs) and associated responsibilities (blaming other profession), technical issues (need for pathology assistants, better clearing solutions and laboratory facilities), and a lack of organizational support for multidisciplinary interaction (little communication between surgeons and pathologists) or quality improvement (no change leaders or capacity for monitoring). CONCLUSION: Use of an exploratory approach provided an in-depth view of the way that numerous factors amenable to quality improvement influenced the adoption of new CRC LN staging recommendations. Continued interventions targeting physicians and executives, in the absence of a receptive organizational infrastructure, may be fruitless. Individualized rather than regional or punitive performance data, coupled with increased organizational capacity for change may stimulate greater surgical and organizational response to quality improvement. Descriptive or experimental studies are needed to test these hypotheses.

    Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ar gagliardiAR Gagliardi,fc wrightFC Wright,ma khalifaMA Khalifa,aj smithAJ Smith,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: BMC health services research

    VOLUME: 8

    Page Numbers: 34

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1472-6963

    DAY: 6

    MONTH: 02

    YEAR: 2008

    Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101088677

    Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study.

    AFFILIATION: Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. anna.gagliardi@sunnybrook.ca

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: BMC Health Serv Res

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News