Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity.

Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Abstract Text:

    OBJECTIVES: It is not clear if good methodological quality in developing practice guidelines (GLs) necessarily leads to valid recommendations that, when implemented, are more likely to improve the balance between benefits and harms/costs. We assessed whether or not there is a link between methodological quality and recommendation validity in GLs for the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as a screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the average-risk population. METHODS: We systematically searched for such practice GLs published in English or in French within the last 7 years. Our inclusion criteria limited the initial 36 GLs to 12. Scores for methodological quality based on the AGREE criteria were attributed to each of these 12 GLs. Likewise, we searched for meta-analysis and other systematic reviews (SRs) addressing the issue, and we selected for inclusion 8 SRs that met basic quality criteria according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) of the National Health Service of the United Kingdom (NHS). We used the results and conclusions of these 8 SRs to establish the validity of recommendations made in the 12 included GLs. RESULTS: Regarding methodological quality, the GLs were labeled either "strongly recommend" (n=3), "recommend with provisos or alterations" (n=3), "would not recommend" (n=2), or "unsure" (n=4). The nine GLs recommending for, as well as the three GLs recommending against, mass-screening are equally valid, because the former base their recommendation on the fact that this can decrease CRC-mortality, whereas the latter base their recommendation on the facts that: (1) this procedure would be too expensive and/or not adapted to their local organization of care, and (2) to a lesser extent, the balance between benefits and harms is not crystal-clear from an individual patient perspective. CONCLUSION: The fact that the 12 GLs fell short of basic quality criteria confirms many previous observations in various areas of medicine. Because the 12 GLs were found to be equally valid regarding their FOBT-related recommendations, no relation could be found between their methodological quality and their content validity.

    Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Clinical biochemistry

    VOLUME: 41

    Page Numbers: 459-66

    Journal Abbreviation: Clin. Biochem.

    ISSN: 0009-9120

    DAY: 11

    MONTH: 01

    YEAR: 2008

    Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 133660

    Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity.

    AFFILIATION: Laboratoire de Biologie Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Général, Rodez, France.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Clin Biochem

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Mass colorectal cancer screening: Methodological quality of practice guidelines is not related to their content validity Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News