Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology.

Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Abstract Text:

    Fifty subjects at the New York facility of the National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Research Branch Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression were evaluated for cross-sectional psychopathology and functional impairment at the 2-year followup by two professional raters, one blind and one with extensive knowledge of the subject's psychiatric history and course of illness and treatment (the cohort rater). Ratings were made on the change version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Interrater reliability, as tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient, was quite good for most of the symptom ratings and fair on measures of functional impairment and social functioning. However, there was a consistent tendency for the blind rater to score higher levels on symptoms of depression and anxiety than the informed cohort rater. Reasons for disagreement in different symptom areas are discussed. Using only the informed rater provides a very adequate picture of severity and patterns of psychopathology on a cross-sectional basis.

    Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar natural sciences: science: research: research design research abstracts see: natural sciences: science: research: research design research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, U.S. Gov't,

    Journal: Psychiatry research

    VOLUME: 12

    Page Numbers: 207-17

    Journal Abbreviation: Psychiatry Res

    ISSN: 0165-1781

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: Jul

    YEAR: 1984

    Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7911385

    Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Research Design

    MESH TERMS: standards

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology.

    AFFILIATION:

    Country: NETHERLANDS

    NETHERLANDS Research PublicationNETHERLANDS Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NIMH

    GRANT: NIMH 30906

    ACRONYM: MH

    MEDLINETA: Psychiatry Res

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Informed versus blind: the reliability of cross-sectional ratings of psychopathology Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News