OBJECTIVE: To determine whether including the study questionnaire with a letter of invitation improves the response rate in a telephone-based survey. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This randomized controlled trial was part of a larger study to assess patient preferences for novel and controversial treatments for inflammatory bowel disease at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: Of 270 eligible patients, 124 (46%) were randomized to receive the questionnaire plus invitation whereas 146 (54%) were in the control group receiving a letter of invitation only. The consent rate was 26% for those receiving the questionnaire and 36% for the control group. The odds ratio for consent to participate among those sent the questionnaire to those not sent the questionnaire was 0.63 (95% CI=0.37-1.07). CONCLUSION: This study found that the advance mailing of a questionnaire to potential participants in a telephone survey reduced the likelihood of their participation.
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Publishing Authors By Initials
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Journal Published:
PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article
Journal: Journal of clinical epidemiology
VOLUME: 60
Page Numbers: 1312-4
Journal Abbreviation:
ISSN: 0895-4356
DAY: 24
MONTH: 08
YEAR: 2007
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Information
Number of References:
LANGUAGE: eng
NlmUniqueID: 8801383
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Keywords Mesh Terms:
KEYWORDS:
MESH TERMS:
Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Information
Substance Name:
Registry Number:
Grant and Affiliation Information for Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
AFFILIATION: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney South West Area Health Service & University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Country: England
AGENCY:
GRANT:
ACRONYM:
MEDLINETA: J Clin Epidemiol
REFSOURCE:
DATABASENAME:
ACCESSION NUMBER:
Number Hits: 0
Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate Related Publications