Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.

Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Abstract Text:

    christopher m byrneChristopher M Byrne,james d harrisonJames D Harrison,jane m youngJane M Young,warwick s selbyWarwick S Selby,michael j solomonMichael J Solomon,christopher m byrneChristopher M Byrne,james d harrisonJames D Harrison,jane m youngJane M Young,warwick s selbyWarwick S Selby,michael j solomonMichael J Solomon,christopher m byrneChristopher M Byrne,james d harrisonJames D Harrison,jane m youngJane M Young,warwick s selbyWarwick S Selby,michael j solomonMichael J Solomon,

    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether including the study questionnaire with a letter of invitation improves the response rate in a telephone-based survey. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This randomized controlled trial was part of a larger study to assess patient preferences for novel and controversial treatments for inflammatory bowel disease at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: Of 270 eligible patients, 124 (46%) were randomized to receive the questionnaire plus invitation whereas 146 (54%) were in the control group receiving a letter of invitation only. The consent rate was 26% for those receiving the questionnaire and 36% for the control group. The odds ratio for consent to participate among those sent the questionnaire to those not sent the questionnaire was 0.63 (95% CI=0.37-1.07). CONCLUSION: This study found that the advance mailing of a questionnaire to potential participants in a telephone survey reduced the likelihood of their participation.

    Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Publishing Authors By Initials

    cm byrneCM Byrne,jd harrisonJD Harrison,jm youngJM Young,ws selbyWS Selby,mj solomonMJ Solomon,cm byrneCM Byrne,jd harrisonJD Harrison,jm youngJM Young,ws selbyWS Selby,mj solomonMJ Solomon,cm byrneCM Byrne,jd harrisonJD Harrison,jm youngJM Young,ws selbyWS Selby,mj solomonMJ Solomon,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of clinical epidemiology

    VOLUME: 60

    Page Numbers: 1312-4

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0895-4356

    DAY: 24

    MONTH: 08

    YEAR: 2007

    Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8801383

    Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.

    AFFILIATION: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney South West Area Health Service & University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Clin Epidemiol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News