Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.

In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Abstract Text:

    diana glaserDiana Glaser,douglas a dennisDouglas A Dennis,richard d komistekRichard D Komistek,todd m minerTodd M Miner,diana glaserDiana Glaser,douglas a dennisDouglas A Dennis,richard d komistekRichard D Komistek,todd m minerTodd M Miner,

    BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has been developed to reduce incision length, muscle damage, and rehabilitation time. However, reduced exposure of anatomical landmarks may result in technical errors and inferior implant survivorship. The objective of this study was to compare in vivo motions and hip joint contact forces during gait in total hip arthroplasty subjects, performed with either minimally invasive surgery or standard surgical approaches. METHODS: Fifteen subjects implanted using either minimally invasive surgery anterolateral, minimally invasive surgery posterolateral, or traditional posterolateral total hip arthroplasty were evaluated using fluoroscopy while performing gait on a treadmill. Kinematics, obtained using 3D-to-2D image registration technique, were input as temporal functions in a 3D inverse dynamic mathematical model that determines in vivo soft tissue and hip contact forces. FINDINGS: The subjects implanted with posterolateral and anterolateral minimally invasive surgery demonstrated significantly less separation than those implanted with the traditional approach (P<0.01). The minimally invasive surgery subjects also experienced lower average maximum peak forces, with 3.2 body weight for the anterolateral minimally invasive surgery and 2.9 body weight for the posterolateral minimally invasive surgery subjects, compared to 3.5 body weight for the traditional subjects (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively). INTERPRETATION: This is the first study to compare in vivo weight-bearing kinematics, separation and kinetics for traditional, anterolateral minimally invasive surgery and posterolateral minimally invasive surgery total hip arthroplasty subject groups. Our data indicated in all analyzed parameters differences between the minimally invasive surgery and the traditional groups, with favorable results for the minimally invasive surgery subjects. This may be related, to a reduction in stabilizing soft tissues after a minimally invasive surgery procedure, leading to lower bearing surface forces at the femoral head--acetabular cup interface.

    In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Publishing Authors By Initials

    d glaserD Glaser,da dennisDA Dennis,rd komistekRD Komistek,tm minerTM Miner,d glaserD Glaser,da dennisDA Dennis,rd komistekRD Komistek,tm minerTM Miner,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)

    VOLUME: 23

    Page Numbers: 127-34

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0268-0033

    DAY: 26

    MONTH: 11

    YEAR: 2007

    In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8611877

    In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.

    AFFILIATION: University of Tennessee, Biomedical Engineering Department, 301 Perkins Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News