Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Abstract Text:

    i mccallumI McCallum,p m kingP M King,j bruceJ Bruce,i mccallumI McCallum,p m kingP M King,j bruceJ Bruce,

    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus arises in the hair follicles in the buttock cleft at the bottom of the backbone. The estimated incidence is 26 per 100,000, people, affecting men twice as often as women. The mean age of presentation is 21 years (men) and 19 years (women) respectively.Pilonidal sinus results in chronic discharging wounds that cause pain and impact upon quality of life and social function. These sinuses may become infected and present as acute abscesses. Management of these abscesses is uncontroversial and revolves around incision and drainage, however, the mode of surgical management of the chronic discharging sinus is debatable.Surgical strategies traditionally centre on excision of the sinus tracts followed by primary closure and healing by primary intention or leaving the wound open to heal by secondary intention. There is uncertainty as to whether open or closed surgical management is more effective. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative effects of open compared with closed surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus on the outcomes of time to healing, infection and recurrence rate. SEARCH STRATEGY: We sought relevant trials from the Wounds Group Specialised Register (Searched 13/6/07); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2007, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 - May Week 5 200& ); Ovid EMBASE (1980 - 2007 Week 23); Ovid CINAHL (1982 - June Week 2 2007). We checked the bibliographies of review and primary articles for relevant studies and contacted authors of all included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating open with closed surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Exclusion criteria were: non-RCTs; children aged younger than 14 years and studies of pilonidal abscess. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening of eligible studies, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of trials were conducted independently by two review authors. Data from eligible studies were recorded using data extraction forms and any disagreements were referred to a third review author. Results were presented using mean differences for continuous outcomes and relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included (1573 patients). Twelve RCTs compared open healing with primary closure, 10 of which used midline closure and 2 trials used off-midline closure. Six studies compared midline and off-midline closure.Open compared with closed techniques: Evidence suggested more rapid healing after primary closure although there was no difference in the infection rate after wound closure. Recurrence was less likely to occur after open healing (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66) suggesting a 58% lower risk of recurrence after open wound healing compared with primary closure. Patients returned to work earlier after primary closure (WMD 10.48 days 95% CI 5.75 to 15.21 days). There was no difference between the two groups for other complications and length of stay. There were few useable data on cost, patient satisfaction and pain.Closed midline compared with closed off-midline: there was good evidence of slower healing, higher rates of infection (RR 4.70; 95% CI 1.93 to 11.45), higher rates of recurrence (Peto OR 4.95; 95% CI 2.18 to 11.24) and other complications (RR 8.94; 95% CI 2.10 to 38.02) after midline primary closure compared with off-midline closure techniques. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No clear benefit was shown for surgical management by primary closure or open healing by secondary intention. A clear benefit was shown for off-midline closure rather than midline closure after pilonidal sinus surgery. Off-midline closure should be the standard management when primary closure is the desired surgical option.

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Publishing Authors By Initials

    i mccallumI McCallum,pm kingPM King,j bruceJ Bruce,i mccallumI McCallum,pm kingPM King,j bruceJ Bruce,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Review

    Journal: Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)

    VOLUME:

    Page Numbers: CD006213

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1469-493X

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: 10

    YEAR: 2007

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Information

    Number of References: 50

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 100909747

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

    AFFILIATION:

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News