Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Abstract Text:

    sanjay v patelSanjay V Patel,leo j maguireLeo J Maguire,jay w mclarenJay W McLaren,david o hodgeDavid O Hodge,william m bourneWilliam M Bourne,

    PURPOSE: To compare corneal haze (backscattered light) and visual outcomes between fellow eyes randomized to LASIK with the flap created by a femtosecond laser (bladeless) or with the flap created by a mechanical microkeratome. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, paired-eye study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one patients (42 eyes) received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism. METHODS: One eye of each patient was randomized to flap creation with a femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase Corp., Irvine, CA) with intended thickness of 120 microm, and the fellow eye to flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome (Hansatome, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) with intended thickness of 180 microm. Patients were examined before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after LASIK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal backscatter, high-contrast visual acuity, manifest refractive error, contrast sensitivity, and intraocular forward light scatter were measured at each examination. Flap thickness was measured by confocal microscopy at 1 month, and patients were asked if they preferred the vision in either eye at 3 months. RESULTS: Corneal backscatter was 6% higher after bladeless LASIK than after LASIK with the mechanical microkeratome at 1 month (P = 0.007), but not at 3 or 6 months. High-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and forward light scatter did not differ between treatments at any examination. Flap thicknesses at 1 month were 143+/-16 microm (bladeless, mean +/- standard deviation) and 138+/-22 microm (mechanical microkeratome), with no statistical difference in variances. At 3 months, 5 patients preferred the bladeless eye, 7 patients preferred the microkeratome eye, and 9 patients had no preference. CONCLUSIONS: The method of flap creation did not affect visual outcomes during the first 6 months after LASIK. Although corneal backscatter was greater early after bladeless LASIK than LASIK with the mechanical microkeratome, patients did not perceive a difference in vision.

    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Publishing Authors By Initials

    sv patelSV Patel,lj maguireLJ Maguire,jw mclarenJW McLaren,do hodgeDO Hodge,wm bourneWM Bourne,

    For similar visual acuity research abstracts see: visual acuity research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Ophthalmology

    VOLUME: 114

    Page Numbers: 1482-90

    Journal Abbreviation: Ophthalmology

    ISSN: 1549-4713

    DAY: 13

    MONTH: 03

    YEAR: 2007

    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7802443

    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Visual Acuity

    MESH TERMS: physiology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. patel.sanjay@mayo.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NEI

    GRANT: EY 02037

    ACRONYM: EY

    MEDLINETA: Ophthalmology

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News