Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity.

Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Abstract Text:

    shannon scott-findlayShannon Scott-Findlay,carolee pollockCarolee Pollock,shannon scott-findlayShannon Scott-Findlay,carolee pollockCarolee Pollock,shannon scott-findlayShannon Scott-Findlay,carolee pollockCarolee Pollock,

    Objective: To dispel some of the conceptual confusion in the field of evidence-based practice that has resulted from the overlapping use of the terms research, evidence, and knowledge. Approach: Theoretical discussion. Findings: Often the terms research and knowledge are used as synonyms for evidence, but the overlap is never complete. The term evidence has long been understood to mean the findings of research. Discussion: Recent attempts to broaden the definition of evidence to include clinical experience and experiential knowledge have been misguided. Broadening our understanding of the basis for clinical decision making and conceptualizing evidence are quite different tasks. Other factors (not other forms of evidence) do shape the clinical decision-making process, but they are not evidence. We might better term them knowledge. Confusing evidence with these other factors has hindered research and the improvement of clinical decision making in health care. We argue that this confusion results from the use of the term evidence when we really mean either research findings or knowledge. Conclusions: In this article, we have argued for specificity in the use of the term evidence. We urge the restriction of the term evidence to research findings, and while we acknowledge the importance of other influences on the clinical decision-making process, we insist that they are not evidence. The time has come to value personal experience and experiential knowledge for what they are-we should not have to disguise them as types of evidence for them to be deemed of any value. Being specific to language, the goal is to improve clinical decision making by increasing practitioners' reliance on research findings (evidence) while acknowledging (and valuing) the important part played by other forms of knowledge in the decision-making process. The distinctions are important.

    Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Publishing Authors By Initials

    s scott-findlayS Scott-Findlay,c pollockC Pollock,s scott-findlayS Scott-Findlay,c pollockC Pollock,s scott-findlayS Scott-Findlay,c pollockC Pollock,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Worldviews on evidence-based nursing / Sigma Theta

    VOLUME: 1

    Page Numbers: 92-7

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1545-102X

    DAY: 28

    MONTH: 11

    YEAR: 2004

    Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101185267

    Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity.

    AFFILIATION:

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Evidence, research, knowledge: a call for conceptual clarity Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News