Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.

Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Abstract Text:

    heather t goldHeather T Gold,huong t doHuong T Do,

    OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of three published algorithms designed to identify incident breast cancer cases using recent inpatient, outpatient, and physician insurance claims data. DATA: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data linked with Medicare physician, hospital, and outpatient claims data for breast cancer cases diagnosed from 1995 to 1998 and a 5 percent control sample of Medicare beneficiaries in SEER areas. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of three algorithms applied to new data compared with original reported results. Algorithms use health insurance diagnosis and procedure claims codes to classify breast cancer cases, with SEER as the reference standard. We compare algorithms by age, stage, race, and SEER region, and explore via logistic regression whether adding demographic variables improves algorithm performance. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sensitivity of two of three algorithms is significantly lower when applied to newer data, compared with sensitivity calculated during algorithm development (59 and 77.4 percent versus 90 and 80.2 percent, p<.00001). Sensitivity decreases as age increases, and false negative rates are higher for cases with in situ, metastatic, and unknown stage disease compared with localized or regional breast cancer. Substantial variation also exists by SEER registry. There was potential for improvement in algorithm performance when adding age, region, and race to an indicator variable for whether the algorithm determined a subject to be a breast cancer case (p<.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Differential sensitivity of the algorithms by SEER region and age likely reflects variation in practice patterns, because the algorithms rely on administrative procedure codes. Depending on the algorithm, 3-5 percent of subjects overall are misclassified in 1998. Misclassification disproportionately affects older women and those diagnosed with in situ, metastatic, or unknown-stage disease. Algorithms should be applied cautiously to insurance claims databases to assess health care utilization outside SEER-Medicare populations because of uneven misclassification of subgroups that may be understudied already.

    Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ht goldHT Gold,ht doHT Do,

    For similar geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research abstracts see: geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Validation Studies

    Journal: Health services research

    VOLUME: 42

    Page Numbers: 2056-69

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0017-9124

    DAY: 20

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 53006

    Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: United States

    MESH TERMS: epidemiology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 411 E, 69th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Health Serv Res

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News