Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring.

Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Abstract Text:

    elaine symanskiElaine Symanski,nicole m h greesonNicole M H Greeson,wenyaw chanWenyaw Chan,

    BACKGROUND: While studies indicate that the attenuating effects of imperfectly measured exposure can be substantial, they have not had the requisite data to compare methods of assessing exposure for the same individuals monitored over common time periods. METHODS: We examined measurement error in multiple exposure measures collected in parallel on 32 groups of workers. Random-effects models were applied under both compound symmetric and exponential correlation structures. Estimates of the within- and between-worker variances were used to contrast the attenuation bias in an exposure-response relationship that would be expected using an individual-based exposure assessment for different exposure measures on the basis of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: ICC estimates ranged widely, indicative of a great deal of measurement error in some exposure measures while others contained very little. There was generally less attenuation in the biomarker data as compared to measurements obtained by personal sampling and, among biomarkers, for those with longer half-lives. The interval ICC estimates were often-times wide, suggesting a fair amount of imprecision in the point estimates. Ignoring serial correlation tended to over estimate the ICC values. CONCLUSIONS: Although personal sampling results were typically characterized by more intra-individual variability than inter-individual variability when compared to biological measurements, both types of data provided examples of exposure measures fraught with error. Our results also indicated substantial imprecision in the estimates of exposure measurement error, suggesting that greater emphasis needs to be given to studies that collect sufficient data to better characterize the attenuating effects of an error-prone exposure measure.

    Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Publishing Authors By Initials

    e symanskiE Symanski,nm greesonNM Greeson,w chanW Chan,

    For similar natural sciences: science: research: research design research abstracts see: natural sciences: science: research: research design research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, U.S. Gov't,

    Journal: American journal of industrial medicine

    VOLUME: 50

    Page Numbers: 112-21

    Journal Abbreviation: Am. J. Ind. Med.

    ISSN: 0271-3586

    DAY: 3

    MONTH: Feb

    YEAR: 2007

    Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8101110

    Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Research Design

    MESH TERMS: statistics & numerical data

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring.

    AFFILIATION: Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Elaine.Symanski@uth.tmc.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NIOSH

    GRANT: R03 OH007834

    ACRONYM: OH

    MEDLINETA: Am J Ind Med

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Evaluating measurement error in estimates of worker exposure assessed in parallel by personal and biological monitoring Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News