Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling.

Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Abstract Text:

    AIMS: To compare conventional methods of epiretinal membrane peeling with viscodissection. METHODS: 154 eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) that underwent pars plana vitrectomy with membrane dissection (89 traditional, 65 viscodissection) were studied retrospectively. Incidence of retinal breaks (RBs), length of time under anaesthesia, postoperative intraocular pressure, retinal reattachment rate, and final visual acuity (VA) were measured. RESULTS: To compare cases of similar complexity, a "complexity score" was defined. The average complexity score for cases done with and without viscodissection was 4.7 and 3.2, respectively. The mean frequency of RBs in eyes undergoing viscodissection was 0.43 (SD 0.5) v 0.14 (0.35) RBs/eye without viscodissection. In complex cases, the frequency of posterior/peripheral RBs was 0.31 (0.47)/0.13 (0.34) RBs/eye, respectively, with viscodissection v 0.12 (0.33)/0.23 (0.43) RBs/eye without viscodissection. None of these differences were statistically significant. The average preoperative/postoperative VA (logMAR) in the viscodissection cohort was 1.7/1.3 (range 0.3 to >1.9/0.1 to >1.9) v 1.4/1 (range 0.48 to >1.9/0.1 to >1.9) in the non-viscodissection cohort, among eyes with 6 months of follow up. Anaesthesia duration was significantly shorter for cases done without viscodissection (p=0.03), but cases done with viscodissection were significantly more complex than cases done without viscodissection (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Viscodissection appears to be a safe and effective alternative technique in eyes with PDR. Owing to the retrospective nature of the study, additional studies are warranted.

    Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar eye diseases: vitreous detachment research abstracts see: eye diseases: vitreous detachment research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: The British journal of ophthalmology

    VOLUME: 87

    Page Numbers: 737-41

    Journal Abbreviation: Br J Ophthalmol

    ISSN: 0007-1161

    DAY: 28

    MONTH: Jun

    YEAR: 2003

    Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 421041

    Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Vitreous Detachment

    MESH TERMS: etiology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling.

    AFFILIATION: The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, NJ, USA.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Br J Ophthalmol

    REFSOURCE: Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;88(4):598-9

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Epiretinal membrane removal in diabetic eyes: comparison of viscodissection with conventional methods of membrane peeling Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News