Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.

Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Abstract Text:

    e a elamE A Elam,k rehmK Rehm,b j hillmanB J Hillman,k maloneyK Maloney,l l fajardoL L Fajardo,k mcneillK McNeill,

    As part of our continuing evaluation of the clinical applicability of digital radiography, we compared the abilities of radiologists to detect pneumothoraces on conventional chest radiographs with their performances when using three formats of digitally obtained images. Twenty-three frontal-view chest radiographs with pneumothoraces and 22 other chest radiographs, either normal or showing miscellaneous abnormalities, were interpreted by five experienced radiologists in each of four formats: conventional film-screen chest radiographs, small-format (17.8 x 21.6 cm) computed radiographs, large-format (35.6 x 43.1 cm) computed radiographs, and digital images viewed on an interactive electronic workstation. The receiver-operating-characteristic curve areas for each observer for the four types of images were compared by a z test on a critical ratio, and the mean sensitivity and specificity values were compared by the sign rank test. The mean areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves ranged from 0.869 for the digital workstation to 0.915 for film-screen images. The differences observed among formats were not statistically significant. Mean specificities also were not significantly different, ranging from 0.90 for large-format computed radiographs to 0.96 for the digital workstation. Mean sensitivity ranged from 0.65 for the digital workstation to 0.82 for film-screen images. Radiologists interpreting digital workstation images were significantly less sensitive in detecting pneumothoraces than with film-screen and small-format computed images (p = .06). In this study, radiologists detected pneumothoraces equally well on conventional film-screen radiographs and digital images printed on film; however, they detected pneumothoraces less well on electronic viewing consoles. This latter finding reflects an important practical difference in the working behavior of radiologists interacting with a digital workstation.

    Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ea elamEA Elam,k rehmK Rehm,bj hillmanBJ Hillman,k maloneyK Maloney,ll fajardoLL Fajardo,k mcneillK McNeill,

    For similar equipment and supplies: x-ray intensifying screens research abstracts see: equipment and supplies: x-ray intensifying screens research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

    VOLUME: 158

    Page Numbers: 509-14

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0361-803X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 1992

    Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7708173

    Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: X-Ray Intensifying Screens

    MESH TERMS: radiography

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Radiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson 85724.

    Country: UNITED STATES

    UNITED STATES Research PublicationUNITED STATES Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News