Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth.

Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Abstract Text:

    anne l hagueAnne L Hague,michele p carrMichele P Carr,

    BACKGROUND: Manual floss is often difficult to use, particularly in hard to reach posterior teeth. Many prefer automated flossers because of their ease of use. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of an automated flosser to manual floss for anterior, premolar, and molar teeth using the plaque index (PI) and gingival (GI) index. METHODS: A 10-week, two-treatment period, crossover design was used. The subjects were randomly assigned to control (C), manual (M), or automated (A) groups. The PI and GI were measured interdentally at baseline and days 15 and 30. Treatment subjects were assigned to the opposite group at the second baseline visit after a 2-week washout period. Subjects brushed twice a day. Treatment subjects used their respective floss once per day. Subjects refrained from oral hygiene 24 hours before study visits. The PI was measured pre- and postintervention on days 15 and 30. Mixed-effect analysis of covariance crossover models were used to test group effects at days 15 and 30 from both periods with the corresponding mean preintervention and baseline score as covariates for PI and GI, respectively. Within-subject treatment comparisons were made, and carryover effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (N = 102) were students (mean age, 23.3 +/- 5.0 [SD] years) with minimal gingivitis at baseline. At days 15 and 30, the M group had more plaque than the A group for all regions (P < or = 0.008), and the C group had more plaque than the A (P <0.001) and M groups (P < or = 0.021) for all regions. No regional treatment effect was observed for the GI. Within-subject analyses were more favorable for the A group than the M group. No significant carryover effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The automated flossing device removed significantly more interproximal plaque in molar, premolar, and anterior teeth compared to manual floss at days 15 and 30. There was no significant difference in interdental inflammation between groups.

    Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Publishing Authors By Initials

    al hagueAL Hague,mp carrMP Carr,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Journal of periodontology

    VOLUME: 78

    Page Numbers: 1529-37

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Periodontol.

    ISSN: 0022-3492

    DAY: 2

    MONTH: Aug

    YEAR: 2007

    Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8000345

    Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth.

    AFFILIATION: Dental Hygiene, Section of Primary Care, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43218, USA. hague.23@osu.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Periodontol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Efficacy of an automated flossing device in different regions of the mouth Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News