Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.

Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Abstract Text:

    joseph s perkellJoseph S Perkell,margaret dennyMargaret Denny,harlan laneHarlan Lane,frank guentherFrank Guenther,melanie l matthiesMelanie L Matthies,mark tiedeMark Tiede,jennell vickJennell Vick,majid zandipourMajid Zandipour,ellen burtonEllen Burton,

    The role of auditory feedback in speech production was investigated by examining speakers' phonemic contrasts produced under increases in the noise to signal ratio (N/S). Seven cochlear implant users and seven normal-hearing controls pronounced utterances containing the vowels /i/, /u/, /e/ and /ae/ and the sibilants /s/ and /I/ while hearing their speech mixed with noise at seven equally spaced levels between their thresholds of detection and discomfort. Speakers' average vowel duration and SPL generally rose with increasing N/S. Average vowel contrast was initially flat or rising; at higher N/S levels, it fell. A contrast increase is interpreted as reflecting speakers' attempts to maintain clarity under degraded acoustic transmission conditions. As N/S increased, speakers could detect the extent of their phonemic contrasts less effectively, and the competing influence of economy of effort led to contrast decrements. The sibilant contrast was more vulnerable to noise; it decreased over the entire range of increasing N/S for controls and was variable for implant users. The results are interpreted as reflecting the combined influences of a clarity constraint, economy of effort and the effect of masking on achieving auditory phonemic goals-with implant users less able to increase contrasts in noise than controls.

    Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Publishing Authors By Initials

    js perkellJS Perkell,m dennyM Denny,h laneH Lane,f guentherF Guenther,ml matthiesML Matthies,m tiedeM Tiede,j vickJ Vick,m zandipourM Zandipour,e burtonE Burton,

    For similar psychological phenomena and processes: mental processes: perception: auditory perception: speech perception research abstracts see: psychological phenomena and processes: mental processes: perception: auditory perception: speech perception research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    VOLUME: 121

    Page Numbers: 505-18

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    ISSN: 0001-4966

    DAY: 3

    MONTH: Jan

    YEAR: 2007

    Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7503051

    Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Speech Perception

    MESH TERMS: therapy

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.

    AFFILIATION: Speech Communication Group, Research Laboratory of Electronics, and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. perkell@speech.mit.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NIDCD

    GRANT: R01DC003007

    ACRONYM: DC

    MEDLINETA: J Acoust Soc Am

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News