Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.

Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Abstract Text:

    c kimme-smithC Kimme-Smith,a g hausA G Haus,n debruhlN DeBruhl,l w bassettL W Bassett,

    OBJECTIVE: Viewing conditions can affect diagnostic performance differently depending on background optical densities. We quantified detection accuracy when viewing calcifications in glandular tissue under recommended viewing conditions versus accuracy with lower view box luminance and higher ambient lighting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom with adipose, 50% adipose and 50% glandular, and glandular-simulating material was imaged, and images were interpreted by five medical imaging physicists using two lighting conditions: the recommended one, high view box luminance (4365 nits) with low ambient light (25 lx), and a suboptimal one, low view box luminance (1763 nits) with moderate ambient lighting (290 lx). Then, a dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System breast composition pattern type 4) unfixed cadaveric breast with numerous native calcifications was imaged 28 times. Nineteen of the films had added clusters of simulated calcifications. Three radiology fellows, each with 11 months of training in mammography, identified the added calcification clusters in the images under the two lighting conditions. Changes in phantom analysis and accuracy of the clinical diagnosis were compared for each lighting condition. RESULTS: On mammograms of the phantom, both speck and fibril identification were degraded by an average of 1.4 objects for the adipose-simulating section (with its darker optical density). For medium optical densities, found in the section with the simulation of 50% glandular and 50% adipose tissue, suboptimal lighting conditions had little or no effect on speck and fibril identification. For sections of the phantom that simulated glandular tissue, an average of 0.6 specks or fibers were not seen when lighting was suboptimal. With the dense cadaveric breast, the fraction of added calcification clusters detected by the three observers improved by an average of 17% when low luminance viewers and high ambient light were replaced with recommended viewing conditions; individual scores of the observers improved significantly: p values ranged from .02 to .05. CONCLUSION: Luminance of the view box and ambient lighting significantly affect detection of calcifications in dense breasts when images are interpreted by radiologists with about 1 year of training in mammography. Detection of calcifications in phantoms is primarily degraded for adipose tissue with its darker optical density. However, when lighting conditions are suboptimal, some observers also have trouble detecting calcifications in glandular tissue with its low optical density.

    Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Publishing Authors By Initials

    c kimme-smithC Kimme-Smith,ag hausAG Haus,n debruhlN DeBruhl,lw bassettLW Bassett,

    For similar equipment and supplies: phantoms, imaging research abstracts see: equipment and supplies: phantoms, imaging research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

    VOLUME: 168

    Page Numbers: 775-8

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0361-803X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 1997

    Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7708173

    Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Phantoms, Imaging

    MESH TERMS: standards

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.

    AFFILIATION: Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, UCLA School of Medicine 90095, USA.

    Country: UNITED STATES

    UNITED STATES Research PublicationUNITED STATES Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News