Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study.

Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Abstract Text:

    heeje leeHeeje Lee,carlo ercoliCarlo Ercoli,paul d funkenbuschPaul D Funkenbusch,changyong fengChangyong Feng,heeje leeHeeje Lee,carlo ercoliCarlo Ercoli,paul d funkenbuschPaul D Funkenbusch,changyong fengChangyong Feng,

    STATEMENT OF PROBLEM.: In some instances, an implant needs to be placed deep subgingivally, which may result in a less accurate impression of the implant. PURPOSE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the accuracy of implant impressions. MATERIAL AND METHODS.: A stone master model was fabricated with 5 implant analogs (RN synOcta analog), embedded parallel to each other, at the center (E) and the 4 corners (A, B, C, and D). The vertical position of the shoulders of the implants was intentionally different among the implants: A and E were flush with the top surface of the model; B was 2 mm below, and C and D were 4 mm below the surface. The horizontal distances of implants A, B, C, and D from E were measured with a measuring microscope. A cross-shaped metal measuring bar was then fabricated and connected to E, with the arms of the casting designed to be 2 mm above the top surface of the model and incorporating a reference mark. With the measuring bar connected to E, the vertical distances from the apical surface of A, B, C, and D to the measuring reference marks were measured with a digital micrometer. The body of the impression coping for implant D was modified by adding 4 mm of additional impression coping, while standard impression copings were used for all other implants. Open tray impressions were made using medium-body polyether material (Impregum Penta) or a combination of putty and light-body vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) material (Elite HD+) (n=15). Then casts were poured with type IV dental stone. The vertical and horizontal distances of the casts were measured with the methods outlined above for the master model. The distortion values that were determined as differences between the measurements of the master model and those of the casts were collected for statistical analysis. Two-way and 1-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test were performed to compare the distortion values (alpha=.05). RESULTS.: For vertical measurements, 2-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant depth (P=.36), material (P=.24), or interaction effects (P=.06). However, it showed significant depth effect for horizontal measurements (P=.01). Within the polyether group, 1-way repeated measures ANOVA showed significant differences in horizontal measurements among the implants with different depths (P=.03). The post hoc Tukey's test showed that the impression of 4-mm-deep implants with normal impression copings (C) was significantly less accurate than impressions of 0-mm-deep implants (A) (P=.02). Within the VPS group, there was no significant difference among the implants with different depths (P=.09). CONCLUSIONS.: There was no effect of implant depth on the accuracy of the VPS group. However, for the polyether group, the impression of an implant placed 4 mm subgingivally showed a greater horizontal distortion compared to an implant placed more coronally. Adding a 4-mm extension to the retentive part of the impression coping eliminated this difference. (J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113).

    Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Publishing Authors By Initials

    h leeH Lee,c ercoliC Ercoli,pd funkenbuschPD Funkenbusch,c fengC Feng,h leeH Lee,c ercoliC Ercoli,pd funkenbuschPD Funkenbusch,c fengC Feng,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry

    VOLUME: 99

    Page Numbers: 107-13

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0022-3913

    DAY: 11

    MONTH: Feb

    YEAR: 2008

    Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 376364

    Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study.

    AFFILIATION: Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Louisiana State University School of Dentistry, New Orleans, La; Former postgraduate student, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Rochester Eastman Dental Center, Rochester, NY.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Prosthet Dent

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News