Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.

Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Abstract Text:

    david m millsDavid M Mills,

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to further investigate the possibility of developing noninvasive methods of differential diagnosis of hearing disorders through the study of experimental animals with induced lesions. In particular, it was desired to compare distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) responses and auditory brain stem response (ABR) thresholds in Mongolian gerbils having either acoustic or strial damage, using as a reference the same responses measured in a control group of normal young adult gerbils. The goal was to evaluate the potential clinical application of this approach to determining the dominant contribution to sensorineural hearing loss in individual human subjects. DESIGN: DPOAE input-output functions and ABR thresholds were measured over a wide range of stimulus frequencies for three groups: (1) a reference group of normal young adult gerbils; (2) a group in which acoustic damage had been induced 2 wk earlier; (3) a group in which damage to the stria vascularis was induced by a series of furosemide injections. The responses in the experimental groups relative to the normal means were compared to determine which combinations of responses were effective in discriminating between animals with different lesions. Three measures were evaluated in detail: the ABR threshold, the emission threshold at a criterion emission amplitude, and the emission amplitude at a high stimulus level. RESULTS: Considering cases with significant hearing loss (ABR thresholds elevated by 20 dB or more), the best method for distinguishing between the two lesions involved a two-dimensional plot comparing emission and ABR thresholds at the same stimulus frequencies. Acoustic damage cases were found in a broad region where the emission and ABR thresholds were roughly equal, whereas strial damage cases were found in a narrower region where the emission threshold was about 0.4 times the ABR threshold (both in dB). These two cases were compared with a third case introduced by definition, that is, damage to inner hair cell or neural systems resulting in an increase in audiometric threshold but no change in emission responses (e.g., auditory neuropathy). The responses for these three cases were found to lie in different regions of the two-dimensional plot comparing emission and ABR thresholds, provided only that ABR thresholds were elevated 20 dB or more. This diagram also revealed cases of preclinical acoustic damage, in which the ABR threshold was shifted less than 20 dB but where the emission threshold was significantly elevated. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly demonstrate the possibility of developing a clinical method of noninvasive differential diagnosis of hearing loss. The method demonstrated was to add to a standard audiometric evaluation the measurement of DPOAE growth functions over the range of frequencies where these emissions were relatively easy to measure and consistent. The DPOAE stimulus frequencies were chosen to match the audiometric frequencies, and the corresponding emission and audiometric thresholds were compared on a threshold-threshold plot for each individual at a number of stimulus frequencies. Responses in different regions in this plot were found to correspond to different types of sensorineural hearing loss.

    Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Publishing Authors By Initials

    dm millsDM Mills,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: Ear and hearing

    VOLUME: 27

    Page Numbers: 508-25

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0196-0202

    DAY: 7

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2006

    Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8005585

    Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.

    AFFILIATION: University of Washington, Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. dmmills@u.washington.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Ear Hear

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News