Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors.

Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Abstract Text:

    daniel w louvarDaniel W Louvar,tyson b rogersTyson B Rogers,robert f baileyRobert F Bailey,arthur j matasArthur J Matas,hassan n ibrahimHassan N Ibrahim,daniel w louvarDaniel W Louvar,tyson b rogersTyson B Rogers,robert f baileyRobert F Bailey,arthur j matasArthur J Matas,hassan n ibrahimHassan N Ibrahim,daniel w louvarDaniel W Louvar,tyson b rogersTyson B Rogers,robert f baileyRobert F Bailey,arthur j matasArthur J Matas,hassan n ibrahimHassan N Ibrahim,daniel w louvarDaniel W Louvar,tyson b rogersTyson B Rogers,robert f baileyRobert F Bailey,arthur j matasArthur J Matas,hassan n ibrahimHassan N Ibrahim,

    BACKGROUND.: The long-term renal consequences of kidney donation need to be accurately quantitated. Cystatin C is a freely filtered glycoprotein that may not have the limitations of creatinine as a measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Whether cystatin C is superior to creatinine-based estimates of GFR in those who have donated a kidney in the past has not been tested. METHODS.: We assessed the performance of seven cystatin C and two creatinine-based GFR prediction equations in 187 former kidney donors against iohexol GFR for measuring GFR. We calculated bias, precision, and relative accuracy of these models. RESULTS.: The majority of former donors had a GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m. All cystatin C models, except the Rule model, overestimated GFR (range 5.3-31.4 mL/min/1.73 m). Among the cystatin C models, the Hoek and Rule formulas were least biased at 5.3 and -3.8 mL/min/1.73 m, most precise at 0.41, and were within 30% of iohexol GFR, 89.3 and 96% of the time, respectively. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula underestimated GFR by 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m, was most precise (R=0.47) and fell within 30% of measured GFR at the highest frequency of 96%. When all models were given a rank based on their performance in the bias, precision and accuracy domains, the MDRD model was clearly superior. CONCLUSION.: The MDRD equation is superior to cystatin C-based equations for estimating GFR in former kidney donors. Creatinine measurement is cheaper and the MDRD GFR is given out by most laboratories and therefore it should be the preferred model in this population.

    Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Publishing Authors By Initials

    dw louvarDW Louvar,tb rogersTB Rogers,rf baileyRF Bailey,aj matasAJ Matas,hn ibrahimHN Ibrahim,dw louvarDW Louvar,tb rogersTB Rogers,rf baileyRF Bailey,aj matasAJ Matas,hn ibrahimHN Ibrahim,dw louvarDW Louvar,tb rogersTB Rogers,rf baileyRF Bailey,aj matasAJ Matas,hn ibrahimHN Ibrahim,dw louvarDW Louvar,tb rogersTB Rogers,rf baileyRF Bailey,aj matasAJ Matas,hn ibrahimHN Ibrahim,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Transplantation

    VOLUME: 84

    Page Numbers: 1112-7

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0041-1337

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 2007

    Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 132144

    Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors.

    AFFILIATION: 1 Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Minneapolis, MN. 2 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Transplantation

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News