Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States.

Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Abstract Text:

    gaurav bandiGaurav Bandi,sean p hedicanSean P Hedican,stephen y nakadaStephen Y Nakada,gaurav bandiGaurav Bandi,sean p hedicanSean P Hedican,stephen y nakadaStephen Y Nakada,gaurav bandiGaurav Bandi,sean p hedicanSean P Hedican,stephen y nakadaStephen Y Nakada,

    OBJECTIVES: To determine the current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. METHODS: An email survey was sent to 112 academic urologists subspecializing in minimally invasive management of renal cancer. The survey consisted of 13 questions and 4 clinical scenarios pertaining to the use of ablation technology. The responses were then tabulated and analyzed to determine practice trends. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62%. Ablation was offered by 93% of the academic urology centers and cryoablation was more frequently used (79%) than radiofrequency ablation (55%). Lack of sufficient efficacy data was the most prevalent reason (80%) for not offering ablation. The maximum size limit for offering ablation was 4 cm by 55% and 3 cm by 34% of the respondents. A collaborative approach using both radiologist and urologist was most commonly used (51%). Most urologists (68%) used both laparoscopic and percutaneous technique, depending on the tumor and adjacent organ location. Intraoperative ultrasound was universally used during the laparoscopic technique and was usually performed by the urologist (95%). Computed tomographic scan was the most frequently used imaging modality for percutaneous ablation (78%) and for surveillance of recurrent disease (81%). In a younger, healthy patient, most urologists recommend extirpative approach for the management of a small renal mass, whereas laparoscopic-assisted ablation was most commonly recommended for an elderly patient with comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey suggests that laparoscopic and percutaneous ablation is offered by the majority of academic centers for carefully selected patients.

    Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Publishing Authors By Initials

    g bandiG Bandi,sp hedicanSP Hedican,sy nakadaSY Nakada,g bandiG Bandi,sp hedicanSP Hedican,sy nakadaSY Nakada,g bandiG Bandi,sp hedicanSP Hedican,sy nakadaSY Nakada,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Urology

    VOLUME: 71

    Page Numbers: 113-7

    Journal Abbreviation: Urology

    ISSN: 1527-9995

    DAY: 4

    MONTH: Jan

    YEAR: 2008

    Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 366151

    Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States.

    AFFILIATION: Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Urology

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News