Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement.

CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Abstract Text:

    d m paushterD M Paushter,r k zemanR K Zeman,m l scheiblerM L Scheibler,p l choykeP L Choyke,m h jaffeM H Jaffe,l r clarkL R Clark,

    Although IV injection of contrast material is widely used for detection and follow-up of hepatic metastases on CT, the optimal method of contrast enhancement has not yet been defined. A prospective study was performed in 50 consecutive patients with suspected hepatic metastases. Lesion size and detectability were compared on unenhanced CT scans, scans obtained during a bolus injection of contrast material (early bolus phase), and scans obtained during a rapid infusion after the loading bolus. A total of 60 hepatic lesions were evaluated in 26 patients, 19 with histologic confirmation of metastases and seven with strong supportive evidence. The bolus phase allowed detection of 15% more lesions than did examination during the rapid-infusion phase. Lesion size varied, depending on the timing and method of contrast administration; the largest measurements were obtained during bolus injection of contrast material. In addition, bolus administration of contrast material subjectively resulted in the best lesion detection. Because the three techniques of IV contrast enhancement may produce different size measurements, sequential examinations must be tailored appropriately. Scanning during the bolus phase is technically possible with current CT equipment and is recommended as the primary CT screening examination for hepatic metastases.

    CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Publishing Authors By Initials

    dm paushterDM Paushter,rk zemanRK Zeman,ml scheiblerML Scheibler,pl choykePL Choyke,mh jaffeMH Jaffe,lr clarkLR Clark,

    For similar tomography, x-ray computed research abstracts see: tomography, x-ray computed research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: AJR. American journal of roentgenology

    VOLUME: 152

    Page Numbers: 267-71

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0361-803X

    DAY: 15

    MONTH: Feb

    YEAR: 1989

    CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7708173

    CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Tomography, X-Ray Computed

    MESH TERMS: methods

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Information

    Substance Name: Diatrizoate Meglumine

    Registry Number: 131-49-7

    Grant and Affiliation Information for CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007-2197.

    Country: UNITED STATES

    UNITED STATES Research PublicationUNITED STATES Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: AJR Am J Roentgenol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for iv contrast enhancement Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News