Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective.

Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Abstract Text:

    k michael cummingsK Michael Cummings,anthony brownAnthony Brown,clifford e douglasClifford E Douglas,

    OBJECTIVE: To describe arguments used by cigarette companies to defend themselves against charges that their cigarettes were defective and that they could and should have done more to make cigarettes less hazardous. METHODS: The data for this paper come from the opening statements made by defendants in four court cases: two class action lawsuits (Engle 1999, and Blankenship 2001) and two individual cases (Boeken 2001, and Schwarz 2002). The transcripts of opening statements were reviewed and statements about product defect claims, product testing, and safe cigarette research were excerpted and coded. RESULTS: Responses by cigarette companies to charges that their products were defective has been presented consistently across different cases and by different companies. Essentially the arguments made by cigarette companies boil down to three claims: (1) smoking is risky, but nothing the companies have done has made cigarettes more dangerous than might otherwise be the case; (2) nothing the companies have done or said has kept someone from stopping smoking; and (3) the companies have spent lots of money to make the safest cigarette acceptable to the smoker. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette companies have argued that their products are inherently dangerous but not defective, and that they have worked hard to make their products safer by lowering the tar and nicotine content of cigarettes as recommended by members of the public health community. As a counter argument, plaintiff attorneys should focus on how cigarette design changes have actually made smoking more acceptable to smokers, thereby discouraging smoking cessation.

    Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Publishing Authors By Initials

    km cummingsKM Cummings,a brownA Brown,ce douglasCE Douglas,

    For similar geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research abstracts see: geographic locations: americas: north america: united states research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Review

    Journal: Tobacco control

    VOLUME: 15 Suppl 4

    Page Numbers: iv84-9

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1468-3318

    DAY: 3

    MONTH: Dec

    YEAR: 2006

    Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Information

    Number of References: 43

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9209612

    Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: United States

    MESH TERMS: standards

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. michael.cummings@roswellpark.org

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NCI

    GRANT: CA087486

    ACRONYM: CA

    MEDLINETA: Tob Control

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News