Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.

Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Abstract Text:

    jeffrey c milderJeffrey C Milder,james p lassoieJames P Lassoie,barbara l bedfordBarbara L Bedford,jeffrey c milderJeffrey C Milder,james p lassoieJames P Lassoie,barbara l bedfordBarbara L Bedford,

    Suburban, exurban, and rural development in the United States consumes nearly 1 million hectares of land per year and is a leading threat to biodiversity. In response to this threat, conservation development has been advanced as a way to combine land development and land conservation while providing functional protection for natural resources. Yet, although conservation development techniques have been in use for decades, there have been few critical evaluations of their conservation effectiveness. We addressed this deficiency by assessing the conservation outcomes of one type of conservation development project: conservation and limited development projects (CLDPs). Conducted by land trusts, landowners, and developers, CLDPs use revenue from limited development to finance the protection of land and natural resources. We compared a sample of 10 CLDPs from the eastern United States with their respective baseline scenarios (conventional development) and with a sample of conservation subdivisions--a different conservation development technique characterized by higher-density development. To measure conservation success, we created an evaluation method containing eight indicators that quantify project impacts to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at the site and in the surrounding landscape. The CLDPs protected and managed threatened natural resources including rare species and ecological communities. In terms of conservation benefits, the CLDPs significantly outperformed their respective baseline scenarios and the conservation subdivisions. These results imply that CLDPs can offer a low-impact alternative to conventional development and a low-cost method for protecting land when conventional conservation techniques are too expensive. In addition, our evaluation method demonstrates how planners and developers can incorporate appropriate ecological considerations when designing, reviewing, and evaluating conservation development projects.

    Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Publishing Authors By Initials

    jc milderJC Milder,jp lassoieJP Lassoie,bl bedfordBL Bedford,jc milderJC Milder,jp lassoieJP Lassoie,bl bedfordBL Bedford,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, U.S. Gov't,

    Journal: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society

    VOLUME: 22

    Page Numbers: 70-9

    Journal Abbreviation: Conserv. Biol.

    ISSN: 1523-1739

    DAY: 7

    MONTH: Feb

    YEAR: 2008

    Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9882301

    Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. jcm85@cornell.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Conserv Biol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: an empirical evaluation Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News