Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs.

Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Abstract Text:

    i hennig-paukaI Hennig-Pauka,s bremerichS Bremerich,h nienhoffH Nienhoff,c C ,m ganterM Ganter,f blechaF Blecha,k-h waldmannK-H Waldmann,g f gerlachG F Gerlach,i hennig-paukaI Hennig-Pauka,s bremerichS Bremerich,h nienhoffH Nienhoff,c C ,m ganterM Ganter,f blechaF Blecha,k-h waldmannK-H Waldmann,g f gerlachG F Gerlach,

    Bronchoscopic, endotracheal and transtracheal lung lavage were evaluated in 38 healthy pigs taken from a nucleus herd in a good state of health with respect to their applicability in practice and the traceability of bacteria, cellular parameters and the antimicrobial peptide PR-39 in the respective lavage fluid samples. The total cell count, qualitative morphological cellular characteristics as well as PR-39 could be determined in all lavage fluid samples, while quantitative cell differentiation was not possible in endotracheal lavage samples. The comparison of the three methods resulted in a higher proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs) and higher concentrations of PR-39 in transtracheal samples. For this reason different valuation standards with respect to PMNs and PR-39 concentrations are presupposed for transtracheal lavage samples. The occurrence of pavement epithelial cells as well as the number of contaminating bacterial species per sample was the lowest in transtracheal lavage. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae polymerase chain reaction appeared to have the highest diagnostic sensitivity in combination with bronchoscopic lavage. In conclusion, bronchoscopic and transtracheal lavage were considered to be more appropriate for bacteriological and cytological diagnostics than endotracheal lavage.

    Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Publishing Authors By Initials

    i hennig-paukaI Hennig-Pauka,s bremerichS Bremerich,h nienhoffH Nienhoff,c C ,m ganterM Ganter,f blechaF Blecha,kh waldmannKH Waldmann,gf gerlachGF Gerlach,i hennig-paukaI Hennig-Pauka,s bremerichS Bremerich,h nienhoffH Nienhoff,c C ,m ganterM Ganter,f blechaF Blecha,kh waldmannKH Waldmann,gf gerlachGF Gerlach,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Journal of veterinary medicine. A, Physiology, pat

    VOLUME: 54

    Page Numbers: 428-33

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0931-184X

    DAY: 19

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 100955112

    Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs.

    AFFILIATION: Institute for Microbiology, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. isabel.hennig@tiho-hannover.de

    Country: Germany

    Germany Research PublicationGermany Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Cli

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of three common methods of lung lavage in healthy pigs Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News