Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Abstract Text:

    BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: Electronic medical imaging is important for medical informatics, computerized learning, and especially for the growing field of telemedicine. The image resolution necessary for a clinical application can be determined by use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) experiments. Completely profiling display systems is a tedious process, requiring multiple ROC experiments. We have developed a multiple-choice ROC analysis technique to compare the relative informativeness of digital image formats for a spectrum of cutaneous lesions simultaneously. The technique makes use of logical competitor sets (LCSs) of clinical conditions to redefine multiple-choice responses into the present/absent framework required for conventional ROC curve construction. The study divided 180 slides and digital images into three LCSs: pigmented lesions, flesh-colored papules, and papulosquamous conditions. Eight dermatologists diagnosed the lesions presented in two randomized viewing sessions. Accuracy profiles, independent of individual observer sensitivities, were derived from the responses. RESULTS: The informativeness of color slides and digital images was statistically similar, even when the conditions were stratified by difficulty of diagnosis. Results for nine specific skin conditions represented in the three LCSs were obtained simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Digital images appear to be as informative as slides for specific dermatologic diagnoses in the three LCSs tested. The use of LCSs allows stratification of results by diagnosis with greater efficiency than multiple repeated ROC experiments. Multiple-choice ROC analysis used in conjunction with logical competitor sets is the best currently available method for comparing imaging media for use in visual disciplines such as dermatology, radiology, pathology, and others.

    Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Publishing Authors By Initials

    For similar skin and connective tissue diseases: skin diseases research abstracts see: skin and connective tissue diseases: skin diseases research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Archives of dermatology

    VOLUME: 131

    Page Numbers: 292-7

    Journal Abbreviation: Arch Dermatol

    ISSN: 0003-987X

    DAY: 17

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 1995

    Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 372433

    Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Skin Diseases

    MESH TERMS: diagnosis

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

    Country: UNITED STATES

    UNITED STATES Research PublicationUNITED STATES Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Arch Dermatol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News