Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.

Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abstract Text:

    abraham h dachmanAbraham H Dachman,damien o dawsonDamien O Dawson,philippe leferePhilippe Lefere,hiro yoshidaHiro Yoshida,nasreen u khanNasreen U Khan,nicole ciprianiNicole Cipriani,david t rubinDavid T Rubin,

    BACKGROUND: We performed a pilot study examining the feasibility of a new unprepped CT colonography (CTC) strategy: low fiber diet and tagging (unprepped) vs. low fiber diet, tagging and a magnesium citrate cleansing preparation (prepped). Prior reports of tagging were limited in that the residual stool was neither measured and stratified by size nor did prior reports subjectively evaluate the ease of interpretation by a reader experienced in interpreting CTC examinations. METHODS: Prospective randomized to unprepped n = 14 and prepped n = 14. Colonic segments were subjectively evaluated for residual stool that would potentially interfere with interpretation. Scores were given in the following categories: percentage of residual stool that was touching or nearly touching mucosa, the largest piece of retained stool, effectiveness of tagging, height of residual fluid, degree of distention, ease of interpretation, and reading time. RESULTS: Ease of the CT read (scale where 4 = optimal read) averaged 1.3 for the unprepped group and 2.3 for the prepped group. The mean read time averaged 17.5 min for unprepped and 17.9 min for prepped. The degree of distention (scale where 4 = well distended) averaged 3.7 for unprepped and 3.6 for prepped. Supine and prone images combined, the unprepped group had 160 segments with stool; prepped group had 58 segments. The amount of stool covering the mucosa in all segments averaged 1.6 (33%-66% coverage) in the unprepped group and 0.35 (<33% mucosal coverage) in the prepped group. The mean size of the largest piece of stool was 33.67 mm for unprepped and 4.01 mm for prepped. Percentage of tagged stool was not significantly different between the groups (range of 94-98%). The height of residual fluid averaged 8.37 mm for unprepped and 13.4 mm for prepped. Three polyps in three patients were found during optical colonoscopy (OC) in the unprepped group (5, 6, and 10 mm), none of which were prospectively detected at CTC. Three polyps in three patients were detected during OC in the prepped group (5, 10, and 15 mm), two of which were prospectively detected at CTC. Two false-positive lesions were observed at CTC in one patient in the prepped group. CONCLUSION: There was more stool in the unprepped group and while this factor did not slow down the reading time, it made the examination subjectively harder to interpret and likely caused the three polyps in this group to be missed. We conclude that a truly unprepped strategy that leaves significant residual stool, even if well tagged, is not desirable.

    Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ah dachmanAH Dachman,do dawsonDO Dawson,p lefereP Lefere,h yoshidaH Yoshida,nu khanNU Khan,n ciprianiN Cipriani,dt rubinDT Rubin,

    For similar natural sciences: time: time factors research abstracts see: natural sciences: time: time factors research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE: 2007 Jan-Feb

    Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Abdominal imaging

    VOLUME: 32

    Page Numbers: 96-104

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0942-8925

    DAY: 13

    MONTH: 09

    YEAR: 2006

    Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9303672

    Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Time Factors

    MESH TERMS: administration & dosage

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Information

    Substance Name: Citric Acid

    Registry Number: 77-92-9

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, MC 2026, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. ahdachma@uchicago.edu

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NCRR

    GRANT: M01RR00055

    ACRONYM: RR

    MEDLINETA: Abdom Imaging

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News