Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.

Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Abstract Text:

    andrew thorpeAndrew Thorpe,peter t walshPeter T Walsh,andrew thorpeAndrew Thorpe,peter t walshPeter T Walsh,

    The performance of three, portable, real-time dust monitors was investigated inside a calm air dust chamber for a range of industrial dusts and two sizes of aluminium oxide dust. The instruments tested were the Split 2 (SKC Ltd), Microdust Pro (Casella Ltd) and DataRam (Thermo Electron Ltd), which sampled either passively or actively by connecting a manufacturer-supplied, size-selective adaptor and an air sampling pump to the inlet of the monitor. Two size-selective adaptors were tested with the Split 2: the GS-3 cyclone adaptor and the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) inlet with porous foam inserts. Similarly, two size-selective adaptors were tested with the Microdust Pro: the Higgins-Dewell cyclone adaptor and the conical inhalable sampler (CIS) adaptor with porous foam inserts. The DataRam was tested with a GK 2.05 cyclone adaptor since there was no porous foam adaptor available. The instruments' responses were compared with the reference dust samplers: Casella Higgins-Dewell cyclone for the respirable fraction and IOM sampler for the inhalable fraction. The response of the dust monitors was found to be linear with respirable dust concentration when operated either passively or actively using the cyclone size-selective inlets. Their responses were, however, lower when operated actively with the cyclone adaptors compared to the passive operation and lower still when used with the porous foam inserts. There was also often more scatter in the porous foam measurements, attributable to variable clogging of the foams caused by inconsistent loading with dust. The dust monitor responses were sensitive to changes in particle size when operated passively but much less so in active mode with the cyclone adaptors. The Microdust Higgins-Dewell cyclone adaptor measurements agreed closely with the reference respirable concentration for all dusts, whereas those for the DataRam GK 2.05 and Split 2 GS-3 cyclone adaptors were different to the reference. Concentrations measured with the foam adaptors were considerably lower than both the reference cyclone samplers and the dust monitor cyclone adaptors and increasingly undersampled as they became loaded with dust. Inhalable dust measured with the Split 2 IOM adaptor agreed closely with the reference IOM inhalable samplers, whereas the Microdust CIS adaptor underestimated the inhalable concentration compared to the reference.

    Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Publishing Authors By Initials

    a thorpeA Thorpe,pt walshPT Walsh,a thorpeA Thorpe,pt walshPT Walsh,

    For similar natural sciences: chemistry: chemistry, physical: particle size research abstracts see: natural sciences: chemistry: chemistry, physical: particle size research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: The Annals of occupational hygiene

    VOLUME: 51

    Page Numbers: 679-91

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0003-4878

    DAY: 16

    MONTH: Nov

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 203526

    Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Particle Size

    MESH TERMS: analysis

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Information

    Substance Name: Dust

    Registry Number: 0

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.

    AFFILIATION: Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK. andrew.thorpe@hsl.gov.uk

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Ann Occup Hyg

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News