Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact.

Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Abstract Text:

    frank a pintarFrank A Pintar,narayan yoganandanNarayan Yoganandan,brian d stemperBrian D Stemper,ola bostromOla Bostrom,stephen w rouhanaStephen W Rouhana,kennerly d diggesKennerly D Digges,brian n fildesBrian N Fildes,frank a pintarFrank A Pintar,narayan yoganandanNarayan Yoganandan,brian d stemperBrian D Stemper,ola bostromOla Bostrom,stephen w rouhanaStephen W Rouhana,kennerly h diggesKennerly H Digges,brian n fildesBrian N Fildes,

    Injury to the far side occupant has been demonstrated as a significant portion of the total trauma in side impacts. The objective of the study was to determine the response of PMHS in far side impact configurations, with and without generic countermeasures, and compare responses to the WorldSID and THOR dummies. A far side impact buck was designed for a sled test system that included a center console and three-point belt system. The buck allowed for additional options of generic countermeasures including shoulder or thorax plates or an inboard shoulder belt. The entire buck could be mounted on the sled in either a 90-degree (3-o'clock PDOF) or a 60-degree (2-o'clock PDOF) orientation. A total of 18 tests on six PMHS were done to characterize the far side impact environment at both low (11 km/h) and high (30 km/h) velocities. WorldSID and THOR-NT tests were completed in the same configurations to conduct matched-pair comparisons. For high-speed tests, center console pelvic forces ranged from 3 to 5 kN; thorax or shoulder plate forces (when present) ranged from 3 to 4 kN. Shoulder belt forces were highly dependent on the presence of a thorax or shoulder restraint; without alternate restraint, both inboard and outboard shoulder belt forces were approximately 3 kN. Both dummies had positive and negative biofidelity outcomes. For example, the THOR shoulder against a side restraint produced much higher forces than the PMHS or WorldSID; the WorldSID produced greater pelvic loads in the presence of a shoulder plate than the PMHS or THOR. Both dummies provided good measures of head excursion compared to PMHS across most configurations. Both dummies had difficulty measuring appropriate chest deformations due to belt loading because of measurement device locations. Considerations for countermeasure design should account for the potential for increased injuries to other body regions. For example, in the PMHS tests, a high inboard shoulder belt configuration produced carotid artery trauma. The far side impact environment is unique and there are currently no dummies that are designed specifically to assist countermeasure design. The current test series demonstrated that with some modifications, both the WorldSID and THOR have the potential to function as good human surrogates in far side impact configurations.

    Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Publishing Authors By Initials

    fa pintarFA Pintar,n yoganandanN Yoganandan,bd stemperBD Stemper,o bostromO Bostrom,sw rouhanaSW Rouhana,kd diggesKD Digges,bn fildesBN Fildes,fa pintarFA Pintar,n yoganandanN Yoganandan,bd stemperBD Stemper,o bostromO Bostrom,sw rouhanaSW Rouhana,kh diggesKH Digges,bn fildesBN Fildes,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Stapp car crash journal

    VOLUME: 51

    Page Numbers: 313-60

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1532-8546

    DAY: 18

    MONTH: Oct

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 101133951

    Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact.

    AFFILIATION: Medical College of Wisconsin; VA Medical Center Research-151, 5000 W National Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53295. fpintar@mcw.edu.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Stapp Car Crash J

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT Responses in Simulated Far Side Impact Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News