Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance.

Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Abstract Text:

    gregory m williamsGregory M Williams,jack b gingrichJack B Gingrich,gregory m williamsGregory M Williams,jack b gingrichJack B Gingrich,

    West Nile virus surveillance was conducted at five sites in New Castle County, DE, and one site in Salem County, NJ, from June through September, 2004, using dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control miniature light traps, infusion-baited gravid traps, and resting boxes. All trap types were simultaneously placed at each site every two weeks and run overnight. Collected mosquitoes were identified to species, pooled, and analyzed for virus using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test. In total, 47,972 mosquitoes in 29 species or species groups were analyzed. Light traps collected 60,201 mosquitoes in 28 species or species groups. Gravid traps collected 3,195 mosquitoes in 19 species or species groups. Resting boxes collected 99 mosquitoes in nine species or species groups. In total, 1,500 mosquito pools were tested for WNV resulting in ten positive pools. All positive pools consisted of Culex pipiens, Culex restuans, or Culex salinarius. Seven positive pools were from gravid traps and three were from light traps despite testing almost 14 times as many pools from light traps. The overall infection rate from gravid traps was nearly 33 times greater than the infection rate from light traps, 2.29 and 0.07 infected mosquitoes per 1,000, respectively. The results demonstrate the advantage of using gravid traps for West Nile virus surveillance over light traps or resting boxes.

    Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Publishing Authors By Initials

    gm williamsGM Williams,jb gingrichJB Gingrich,gm williamsGM Williams,jb gingrichJB Gingrich,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov

    Journal: Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society

    VOLUME: 32

    Page Numbers: 285-91

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Vector Ecol.

    ISSN: 1081-1710

    DAY: 11

    MONTH: Dec

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 9512496

    Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance.

    AFFILIATION: Hudson Regional Health Commission, 595 County Ave., Secaucus, NJ 07094, USA.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Vector Ecol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News