Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs.

Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Abstract Text:

    qingxia yaoQingxia Yao,ping qianPing Qian,qinfeng huangQinfeng Huang,yi caoYi Cao,huanchun chenHuanchun Chen,qingxia yaoQingxia Yao,ping qianPing Qian,qinfeng huangQinfeng Huang,yi caoYi Cao,huanchun chenHuanchun Chen,

    The P12A3C gene from FMDV (serotype O) encoding the capsid precursor protein, and the highly immunogenic gene FHG, which encodes multiple epitopes of FMDV capsid proteins, were inserted into eukaryotic expression vectors to compare different candidate genetically engineered vaccines for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). A modified live pseudorabies virus (MLPRV) was also used to deliver P12A3C. Guinea pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with the candidate vaccines to compare the ability to elicit immunity of the DNA vector and a live viral vector. An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA), virus-neutralization test and lymphoproliferation assay were used to detect antibody and cellular responses. The group immunized with P12A3C delivered by MLPRV produced significantly greater antibody and cellular responses indicating that MLPRV has a greater ability to mediate exogenous gene delivery than the plasmid DNA vector. Comparison of the immune responses induced by P12A3C and FHG, which were both mediated by DNA plasmids, showed that FHG and P12A3C elicited similar cellular responses, while P12A3C induced higher antibody levels, suggesting that P12A3C is a more powerful immunogen than FHG. In challenge experiments, guinea pigs vaccinated with P12A3C delivered by MLPRV were protected fully from FMDV challenge, whereas guinea pigs vaccinated with P12A3C or FHG delivered by DNA plasmid were only protected partially. This study provides a basis for future construction of a genetically engineered vaccine for FMDV.

    Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Publishing Authors By Initials

    q yaoQ Yao,p qianP Qian,q huangQ Huang,y caoY Cao,h chenH Chen,q yaoQ Yao,p qianP Qian,q huangQ Huang,y caoY Cao,h chenH Chen,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Journal of virological methods

    VOLUME: 147

    Page Numbers: 143-50

    Journal Abbreviation: J. Virol. Methods

    ISSN: 0166-0934

    DAY: 25

    MONTH: 10

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8005839

    Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs.

    AFFILIATION: Laboratory of Animal Virology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Unit of Animal Infectious Diseases, National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei Province, China.

    Country: Netherlands

    Netherlands Research PublicationNetherlands Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: J Virol Methods

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of immune responses to different foot-and-mouth disease genetically engineered vaccines in guinea pigs Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News