Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography.

Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Abstract Text:

    k hashimotoK Hashimoto,s kawashimaS Kawashima,s kameokaS Kameoka,y akiyamaY Akiyama,t honjoyaT Honjoya,k ejimaK Ejima,k sawadaK Sawada,k hashimotoK Hashimoto,s kawashimaS Kawashima,s kameokaS Kameoka,y akiyamaY Akiyama,t honjoyaT Honjoya,k ejimaK Ejima,k sawadaK Sawada,

    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the image validity of a cone beam CT machine for dental use (3DX) and the latest medical CT system, multidetector row helical CT (MDCT). METHODS: A dried right maxilla of an Asian adult was used as a phantom. It was cut from the zygomatic process towards the midline, parallel to the midline plane, into eight slices of 2 mm thickness. This phantom was imaged with the 3DX and MDCT machines. Images were evaluated by comparing them with one selected bone slice from the phantom. In this comparison, two types of MDCT images were used: one with the window level (WL) and window width (WW) suitable for observing teeth (MDCT tooth image), and the other appropriate for observing bone (MDCT bone image). Three dentists and one radiographer then used our reported subjective five-level scale to evaluate and compare images generated by the two systems in terms of validity. Cancellous bone as well as enamel, dentin, pulp cavity, periodontal ligament space, lamina dura and overall impression were evaluated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were found for almost all observation items. Our subjective evaluation clarified that 3DX was superior to MDCT in terms of image validity. Few significant intra- or interevaluator errors were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our subjective evaluation of image validity clarified 3DX as being superior to MDCT. Taken together with the low skin dose we previously reported for 3DX, the results demonstrate 3DX to be beneficial for imaging diagnosis of hard tissues in the maxillofacial region.

    Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Publishing Authors By Initials

    k hashimotoK Hashimoto,s kawashimaS Kawashima,s kameokaS Kameoka,y akiyamaY Akiyama,t honjoyaT Honjoya,k ejimaK Ejima,k sawadaK Sawada,k hashimotoK Hashimoto,s kawashimaS Kawashima,s kameokaS Kameoka,y akiyamaY Akiyama,t honjoyaT Honjoya,k ejimaK Ejima,k sawadaK Sawada,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Dento maxillo facial radiology

    VOLUME: 36

    Page Numbers: 465-71

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0250-832X

    DAY: 23

    MONTH: Dec

    YEAR: 2007

    Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 7609576

    Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13, Kanda Surugadai, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan. hashimoto-k@dent.nihon-u.ac.jp.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Dentomaxillofac Radiol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News