Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation.

Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Abstract Text:

    risa j robinsonRisa J Robinson,pamela snyderPamela Snyder,michael j oldhamMichael J Oldham,risa j robinsonRisa J Robinson,pamela snyderPamela Snyder,michael j oldhamMichael J Oldham,

    Whole-lung dosimetry codes and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques have been used extensively to predict particle deposition in the respiratory tract of animals and humans. Although these predictions implement three well-known deposition mechanisms (impaction, sedimentation, and diffusion), validation of deposition due to each deposition mechanism in isolation has been difficult. In the current work, impaction deposition predictions using equations from the leading whole-lung dosimetry codes were compared to experimental data for the same Stokes and Reynolds numbers. In addition, impaction was predicted numerically using two commercial CFD packages (CFX and Fluent) and compared to experimental particle deposition, for the same geometry, and flow conditions that were overwhelmingly impaction dominated as measured by the Stokes number. Significant differences were found between CFD predicted deposition due to impaction and the analytical equations contained in whole-lung dosimetry models (NCRP, Trumpet, MPPD). Of the two CFD software packages, CFX typically had the best agreement with the experimental data; however, neither software package agreed well for all Stokes numbers examined. In addition, predicted impaction deposition from whole-lung dosimetry code equations did not agree well with experimental data for all Stokes numbers. These discrepancies highlight the current state of uncertainty in particle deposition predictions and indicate that any single technique or equation may be unsuitable to accurately explain the flow and particle behavior in an airway bifurcation.

    Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Publishing Authors By Initials

    rj robinsonRJ Robinson,p snyderP Snyder,mj oldhamMJ Oldham,rj robinsonRJ Robinson,p snyderP Snyder,mj oldhamMJ Oldham,

    For similar abstracts research abstracts see: abstracts research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal Article

    Journal: Inhalation toxicology

    VOLUME: 20

    Page Numbers: 485-97

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 1091-7691

    DAY: 27

    MONTH: Mar

    YEAR: 2008

    Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8910739

    Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS:

    MESH TERMS:

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation. Information

    Substance Name:

    Registry Number:

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation.

    AFFILIATION: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.

    Country: United States

    United States Research PublicationUnited States Research Publication

    AGENCY:

    GRANT:

    ACRONYM:

    MEDLINETA: Inhal Toxicol

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Particle Deposition Using Commercial CFD Packages: Impaction and Sedimentation Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News