Special Feature

User Panel

My Panel

My Panel

Bookmark Science Articles

Recent News
Bookmark / Share This Science Site

Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule.

Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

  • Abstract Text of This Paper
  • Journal Published
  • MeSH Keywords of This Abstract
  • Chemicals and Substances Used in this Paper
  • Grants and Granting Agency of this Research
  • Database Accession Numbers Used in this Paper
  • Related Papers
  • Related Research Tags
  • Rate this Research Paper
  • Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Abstract Text:

    craig h mallinckrodtCraig H Mallinckrodt,michael j detkeMichael J Detke,christopher j kaiserChristopher J Kaiser,john g watkinJohn G Watkin,geert molenberghsGeert Molenberghs,raymond j carrollRaymond J Carroll,

    BACKGROUND: It has been recommended that onset of antidepressant action be assessed using survival analyses with assessments taken at least twice per week. However, such an assessment schedule is problematic to implement. The present study assessed the feasibility of comparing onset of action between treatments using a categorical repeated measures approach with a traditional assessment schedule. METHOD: Four scenarios representative of antidepressant clinical trials were created by varying mean improvements over time. Two assessment schedules were compared within the simulated 8-week studies: (i) 'frequent' assessment--16 postbaseline visits (twice-weekly for 8 weeks); (ii) 'traditional' assessment--5 postbaseline visits (Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8). Onset was defined as a 20 per cent improvement from baseline, and had to be sustained at all subsequent assessments. Differences between treatments were analysed with a survival analysis (KM = Kaplan-Meier product limit method) and a categorical mixed-effects model repeated measures analysis (MMRM-CAT). RESULTS: More frequent assessments resulted in small reductions in empirical standard errors compared with traditional assessments for both analytic methods. More frequent assessments altered estimates of treatment group differences in KM such that power was increased when the difference between treatments was increasing over time, but power decreased when the treatment difference decreased over time. More frequent assessments had a minimal effect on estimates of treatment group differences in MMRM-CAT. The MMRM-CAT analysis of data from a traditional assessment schedule provided adequate control of type I error, and had power comparable to or greater than that with KM analyses of data from either a frequent or a traditional assessment schedule. CONCLUSION: In the scenarios tested in this study it was reasonable to assess treatment group differences in onset of action with MMRM-CAT and a traditional assessment schedule. Additional research is needed to assess whether these findings hold in data with drop-out and across definitions of onset.

    Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Publishing Authors By Initials

    ch mallinckrodtCH Mallinckrodt,mj detkeMJ Detke,cj kaiserCJ Kaiser,jg watkinJG Watkin,g molenberghsG Molenberghs,rj carrollRJ Carroll,

    For similar investigative techniques: epidemiologic methods: statistics as topic: survival analysis research abstracts see: investigative techniques: epidemiologic methods: statistics as topic: survival analysis research

    PUBMED ID PMID:

    MEDLINE DATE:

    Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Journal Published:

    PUBLICATION TYPE: Research Support, N.I.H., Extr

    Journal: Statistics in medicine

    VOLUME: 25

    Page Numbers: 2384-97

    Journal Abbreviation:

    ISSN: 0277-6715

    DAY: 30

    MONTH: Jul

    YEAR: 2006

    Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Information

    Number of References:

    LANGUAGE: eng

    NlmUniqueID: 8215016

    Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Keywords Mesh Terms:

    KEYWORDS: Survival Analysis

    MESH TERMS: pharmacology

    Chemical & Substance for Abstract: Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule. Information

    Substance Name: Antidepressive Agents

    Registry Number: 0

    Grant and Affiliation Information for Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule.

    AFFILIATION: Eli Lilly & Co., Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

    Country: England

    England Research PublicationEngland Research Publication

    AGENCY: United States NIEHS

    GRANT: P30-ES09106

    ACRONYM: ES

    MEDLINETA: Stat Med

    REFSOURCE:

    DATABASENAME:

    ACCESSION NUMBER:

    Number Hits: 0

    Comparing onset of antidepressant action using a repeated measures approach and a traditional assessment schedule Related Publications

     

    Molecular Station USER Menu

    Welcome to Molecular Station!

    You have to register before you can post on our forums or use our advanced features. Register Now! Its Free and Fast!

    Already registered? Login now below.

    User Name:

    Password:

    Already registered and Forgot your password? Click below to recover it.

    Recover Lost Password

    Join now - it's fast and free!

    Molecular Station is THE largest network of researchers, scientists and science lovers anywhere!

    Research Terms of Usage and Disclaimer
    Home
    Features

    Protocols

    DNA Forum

    Science Forum

    DNA Forum
    Biology Forum

    Science News


    [CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 2

    For more click here:Science News