[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia]

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Research Abstract Details 

Research Abstract Table of Contents

Jump to the:

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Abstract Text:

Biljana Dordevi?,Dragana Loncar-Stojiljkovi?,Dragan Ivanovi?,Gordana Ivanovi?,Milos P Stojiljkovi?,

BACKGROUND: Co-induction in anesthesia is very useful: synergistic effects of two inductional drugs may lower the dose regimen and the incidence of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare two anesthesiological techniques for short-lasting gynecological procedures in outpatient anesthesia. A total of 80 patients scheduled for surgical termination of pregnancy were randomly assigned into two equal groups--control and co-induction group. METOHDS: The first group of patients received atropine 0.5 mg i.v., alfentanil 0.5 mg i.v. and propofol as a fractionated i.v. bolus until the loss of eyelash reflex. The second group received atropin 0.5 mg, alfentanil 0.5 mg, midazolam 3 mg and propofol in the same manner as the first group. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol increments. Cardiovascular parameters, parameters of post anesthesia recovery and the adverse effects were registered. RESULTS: In patients receiving midazolam inductional dose of propofol was significantly lower, whereas cardiovascular parameters were not significantly different. The recovery after anesthesia was slightly longer after co-induction, but it was not of great clinical significance. The reduction of the adverse effects was found in the co-induction group. CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that co-induction of midazolam-propofol in comparison with propofol alone for outpatient anesthesia had the following advantages: the reduction of propofol dose, better quality of anesthesia and the reduction of the adverse effects. Recovery was faster in the group that didn't receive midazolam, but it was not of great clinical significance. The conclusion is that co-induction with the combination midazolam-propofol has the advantage in outpatient procedures.

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Publishing Authors By Initials

B Dordevi?,D Loncar-Stojiljkovi?,D Ivanovi?,G Ivanovi?,MP Stojiljkovi?,

For similar organic chemicals: phenols: propofol research abstracts see: organic chemicals: phenols: propofol research

PUBMED ID PMID:

MEDLINE DATE: 2002 Nov-Dec

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Journal Published:

PUBLICATION TYPE: Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal: Vojnosanitetski pregled. Military-medical and phar

VOLUME: 59

Page Numbers: 609-14

Journal Abbreviation:

ISSN: 0042-8450

DAY: 9

MONTH: 01

YEAR: 2008

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Information

Number of References:

LANGUAGE: scc

NlmUniqueID: 21530700

[Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Keywords Mesh Terms:

KEYWORDS: Propofol

MESH TERMS:

Chemical & Substance for Abstract: [Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia] Information

Substance Name: Alfentanil

Registry Number: 71195-58-9

Grant and Affiliation Information for [Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia]

AFFILIATION:

Country: Yugoslavia

AGENCY:

GRANT:

ACRONYM:

MEDLINETA: Vojnosanit Pregl

REFSOURCE:

DATABASENAME:

ACCESSION NUMBER:

Number Hits: 0

Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia Related Publications

• The time-course of ribavirin-provoked changes of basal and AMPH-induced motor activities in rats.
• Two-component transdental implants.
• [Classification and qualification of nose injuries--clinical and forensic aspects]
• [Co-induction in ambulatory anesthesia]
• [Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland]
• [Malignant acinar-endocrine cell tumor of the pancreas]
• [Ossification of the heart valves]
• [The effect of 4-aminopyridine on indirectly evoked contractions of the diaphragm in rats in situ]
• [Treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures with double dynamic internal fixation]